NWJocko
Tour Winner
If you spend £40-£50mil on one player and he gets injured you are left with no one
If you spend £50mil on two players and one gets injured what are you left with.
Carroll and Suarez, except they were £60m.....
If you spend £40-£50mil on one player and he gets injured you are left with no one
If you spend £50mil on two players and one gets injured what are you left with.
I don't want Bony but Remy and say Rues with Sterling , Sturridge and Markovic gives you a lot of attacking threat as well as adaptability and cover
You don't have to recite history mate i know.
You've not answered my question re; injury?
Its not our fault they don't know how to use Torres.
Phil, don't answer a question with a question.
Im just trying to point out that wether you spend £800k or £80m on a footballer regardless of money they could suffer a bad injury.
Look at Inzaghi at Chelsea a few years ago.
Building?
Rodgers has 2/3 signings in your team (i think). His record with signings isn't great and has been lucky to have inherited Suarez, IMO.
You are almost suggesting Liverpool to down the route you deride arsenal for, at least that's the impression given.
Yes and Chelsea have funds to cover losing expensive players.
City also have funds to just throw money and multiple targets
We on the other hand have to hope ours hit the target - Carroll is a perfect example.
Yes and Chelsea have funds to cover losing expensive players.
City also have funds to just throw money and multiple targets
We on the other hand have to hope ours hit the target - Carroll is a perfect example.
You've just got £75m (plus whatever add ons you say he's getting). What funds do you need?
Only have to look at the amount of replies in Liverpool threads from him.
Totally obsessed
You built a team around him that suited him and stuck everything on his toe for him, wasn't bought by the manager and was told to play him at the time even though he didn't fit into the side of the time. I know he doesn't get the goals he got at L'pool but his work rate is excellent and when he does score, it can be those critical goals when needed. I don't have a major issue with him as we don't look for a dominant goal scorer as we can score from many areas, he does what's asked of him but if you offered what's left in your budget for him, I'd let him go back :smirk:
They only have £35m left now though
I reckon you could get Reus for that and have change. The problem seems to be attracting the elite players to Liverpool
I think if we had a manager with over 38yrs football experience whose won trophies in europe we'd be able to attract the elite players.....
SOS Mr Hodgson :rofl:
I'd love him to go back to Fulham if I'm honest but don't think it'll happen. New owners ruining the club. I don't know how Liverpool attract the players but they don't seem to be able to do it
I don't know how Liverpool attract the players but they don't seem to be able to do it
Do you know which players we have attempted to sign or the type of players we are looking to sign ?
One player has turned us down to live in London
Lots of judgments being made 12 days after the window is open with a lot of time before the window shuts.
Do you know which players we have attempted to sign or the type of players we are looking to sign ?
.
You lot start the endless threads. As you've said before "I'm free to comment" :thup:
An injured player and one not good enough to carry a side in Europe![]()
I've just looked at the last 3 LFC/Suarez related threads. Neither was started by the two posters you are disagreeing with (although I'm sure you'll come back with an alternative definition of 'you lot').
As I said a week or so ago, you do appear to have an obsession with LFC. I also had to ask who you supported.