Some are, some aren't. But it makes sense.Imo, as you have stated, they are there to assist the players in complying with Rule 3.3b. However, I don't believe that they have any authority (unless they are also designated as a referee).
Some are, some aren't. But it makes sense.Imo, as you have stated, they are there to assist the players in complying with Rule 3.3b. However, I don't believe that they have any authority (unless they are also designated as a referee).
My experience is that the role/title is listed as "Scorecard Return".However, I must admit I have never really known what the official title or job specification is of those people behind the desk at these elite events. Are they 'Returning Officers'?
Not sure I understand. "Some are, some aren't", what does that mean? Some are what?Some are, some aren't. But it makes sense.
Imo, as you have stated, they are there to assist the players in complying with Rule 3.3b. However, I don't believe that they have any authority (unless they are also designated as a referee).
Some are, some aren't. But it makes sense.
Not sure I understand. "Some are, some aren't", what does that mean? Some are what?
RefereesNot sure I understand. "Some are, some aren't", what does that mean? Some are what?
Shep, as an ex Handicap Sec (and also assisting the Competition Secretary), I have noted that players have been DQed many times for failing to sign the card. Or their marker failing to sign it. Certain individuals may be guilty of it more than once.I'm struggling to work out what the benefit is of signing a card beforehand. If you have the card in your hand at the end of the round to check the scores then why wouldn't you sign it at the same moment? What benefit is there to be had by signing it at the beginning and then also checking it at the end?
Shep, as an ex Handicap Sec (and also assisting the Competition Secretary), I have noted that players have been DQed many times for failing to sign the card. Or their marker failing to sign it. Certain individuals may be guilty of it more than once.
Ideally, we would remember to do it at the end of the round. But, people are forgetful, they are in a rush, they get distracted by the chat going around them, and they just rush through the process and simply forget. For anyone that has been caught out by that before, I am sure they will be encouraged to sign the card pre-round, or at any point during the round when it crosses their mind, to avoid getting penalised by absent mindedness at the end. It becomes a ritual for some people, and I think it almost becomes second nature to sign the card as soon as they get it.
Well..ChrisD does it so..........Are you saying that signing a card at the beginning of a round is a sign of senility?![]()
Well, forgetfulness. Gotta be careful not to offend in this day and age. Senility may simply be one explanation for forgetfulnessAre you saying that signing a card at the beginning of a round is a sign of senility?![]()
They might forget at the beginning. But, if they do, they might remember after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. And, worst-case, hopefully they remember by the end anyway.I’m struggling to understand why someone could forget to sign at the end of the road, but not at the beginning?
I’m struggling to understand why someone could forget to sign at the end of the road, but not at the beginning?
DQs should be for serious misconduct and siginificant advantages, not for forgetful moments.
Now that's a bad attitude for a competition sec!Totally agree.
Several years ago, I saw a competition sec open the scorecard box and I heard him say
''Let see how many I can DQ today''
Would it be any better if 'can' was replaced by 'have to'? Many of the scorecard boxes I've seen have warnings reminding players to ensure they have signed their card. As for signing own scorecard before playing, I can't see the difference between that and using the checking process as a memory trigger to do so!Now that's a bad attitude for a competition sec!