Tarkus1212
Challenge Tour Pro
She thinks they're both guilty. I agree though it is quite odd that the jury came to that conclusion, it does make me think that his appeal may be successful.
What is bamboozling is if she cannot remember anything them why is one man innocent and one guilty?
What is bamboozling is if she cannot remember anything them why is one man innocent and one guilty?
But she also appears to know someone else is coming. And merely asked not to be left alone. Not for it not to happen. Yes she has been used as a price of meat and that's low. But I'm not sure it's what I call rape.Read that link, explains it quite clearly.
The circumstances by which each man had sex with her were significantly different.
But she also appears to know someone else is coming. And merely asked not to be left alone. Not for it not to happen. Yes she has been used as a price of meat and that's low. But I'm not sure it's what I call rape.
I'd not be surprised if it's iverturned eventually.
I'd imagine in your job you'd need to be able to visit multiple places so not being able to drive could be a reason do be rejected. I'm not trying to belittle his act or support him. But I think it's down to a business to decide who they employ. If I was a conference side of snap him up as he'd probaly get 30+ goals a season and that would keep a club afloat and keep people in work.
Unless a law is passed stating career paths that must follow convictions then I don't see anything changing.
Ok, so it appears they were obviously looking for a drunk girl to take advantage. That doesn't imo constitute rape. She also said you aren't going to leave me are you? That appears to me that she knew others would be coming along? Now whether she knew what would happen is all about opinions. But imo she's gone to the hotel knowing the two of them would have sex and knew of the text. As she knew someone else would be there. I can't imagine in her state she'd have been to bothered if he was just going to leave her there to sleep?
It does look like a lass who's got wasted and made a big mistake and regretted it the next day.
im not sure I've said anywhere that he should be a role model. In fact elsewhere ive argued that footballers shouldn't be expected to be. Just because if their wealth. There are lots of famous people that set bad examples and continue to work. my nephews love iron mans. Should they follow Robert Downey jnr example?
His job didn't help him. He went to town, and took adamant age of a women. If him being famous has played a part then I would argue it rules out rape. Surely if she knew who he was and went back with him, willingly to a hotel she must of had an idea of what his intentions were. Had anytime ever invited a girl back to their hotel just to talk?
So you are saying that if a woman goes back to her room with someone 'famous' and then for whatever reason does not concent to sex, but the man has sex with her without consent, then it is not rape?
Surely with drunken one night stands one person is usually slightly worse for wear than the other? So surely all these cases are rape?Taking advantage of someone who might say no if she were sober IS rape. She may also have known others were coming BUT she may have thought it was for a drinking session. And her state is why the guys should have behaved more responsibly and not taken advantage. The crucial bit is to "to take".
As for Evans and his mate, scumbags? Definitely. Rapists? I have many doubts
I didn't mean that AT ALL. I simply meant that if she'd realised who he was. In her state and chose to go back and knew someone else was coming she must have known the implications. She also said she had no recollection of it. And the hotel worker said he heard noises that appeared to show her enjoying herself. So for me she hadn't rejected him or had second thoughts. She simply got smashed. Made a bad choice and felt ashamed.So you are saying that if a woman goes back to her room with someone 'famous' and then for whatever reason does not concent to sex, but the man has sex with her without consent, then it is not rape? So effectively the act of going to a room with a famous person is consent in your world? And the woman has no right to say no at any stage?
Rape is not just committed by strangers pouncing on women in darkly lit parks.
I think what they did was out of line. But I think it's come from her shame and embarrassment the following morning.
The police arrested both Ched and Clayton at the station, they acknowledged that the only evidence that sexual activity had taken place was their admission. There was no complaint of rape, no forensic evidence, no injury and no complaint.
The complainant said that her next memory was waking up in the hotel room at about 11.30am. She realised that she was alone. She was naked and had urinated in the bed. She had a headache and was confused. She reported the matter to the police.
Excess alcohol only goes to the rich and famous? Do me a favour?!
Apparently they picked her up in a pizza shop! Hardly exclusive. A lot of these clubs have wag wannabes door to door. Looking to sell a story or catch a man. I'm not saying she was one or in any way deserved anything. But If he really is this rapist monster then I'd imagine he could strike again without the need for money.
My post is in context to future behaviour
I didn't mean that AT ALL. I simply meant that if she'd realised who he was. In her state and chose to go back and knew someone else was coming she must have known the implications. She also said she had no recollection of it. And the hotel worker said he heard noises that appeared to show her enjoying herself. So for me she hadn't rejected him or had second thoughts. She simply got smashed. Made a bad choice and felt ashamed.