Slab
Occasional Tour Caddy
As a Hearts fan I believe the club had to challenge the decision to demote without the competition being played out & I’m sure a fan of any other team would hope and expect their club to do similar if they found themselves in the same position
They lost the case because (based on SPFL rules) it was legally proved it wasn’t an unlawful decision for the clubs themselves to vote that relegation outcome onto other clubs.
Whether right or wrong those are the SPFL rules
The point of clubs voting simply through self-preservation & the lost/found/changed vote doesn’t override the overall lawfulness of the process… but it does not mean it shouldn’t have been challenged
Morally, some financial compensation is probably due given the unique circumstances of being relegated without a complete season being played, because no one knows which team would’ve been relegated & also the other relegation spot was conveniently scrapped (as voted for by the same clubs through self-preservation) but since it would've been down to the other clubs to pay any compensation then it’s not practical; namely because there is a ‘do no harm to fellow shareholders’ business rule to be observed
How they played prior to lockdown is not relevant, there are comparable situations every year (and this year in the Premiership & Championship down south) with teams who played poorly & end up escaping the drop
The whole episode exposes serious deficiencies in the way Scottish football is constructed, run, governed and financed, and the pandemic has exposed the same issues in many businesses, so the SPFL is not alone.
The question now is, will it bring about and meaningful change in future?
They lost the case because (based on SPFL rules) it was legally proved it wasn’t an unlawful decision for the clubs themselves to vote that relegation outcome onto other clubs.
Whether right or wrong those are the SPFL rules
The point of clubs voting simply through self-preservation & the lost/found/changed vote doesn’t override the overall lawfulness of the process… but it does not mean it shouldn’t have been challenged
Morally, some financial compensation is probably due given the unique circumstances of being relegated without a complete season being played, because no one knows which team would’ve been relegated & also the other relegation spot was conveniently scrapped (as voted for by the same clubs through self-preservation) but since it would've been down to the other clubs to pay any compensation then it’s not practical; namely because there is a ‘do no harm to fellow shareholders’ business rule to be observed
How they played prior to lockdown is not relevant, there are comparable situations every year (and this year in the Premiership & Championship down south) with teams who played poorly & end up escaping the drop
The whole episode exposes serious deficiencies in the way Scottish football is constructed, run, governed and financed, and the pandemic has exposed the same issues in many businesses, so the SPFL is not alone.
The question now is, will it bring about and meaningful change in future?