Roll Up Group Handicaps

I don't get the first bit. The only self-interest is enjoying social golf. Don't see what impact it has on anyone outside of that group.

The second bit is just wrong, in my experience. The FA and ECB are mostly just keen to ensure that clubs are looking after kids and more vulnerable participants responsibly. They actually go out of their way to encourage fun, less competitive formats.
Unless you're doing it wrong, (almost) all golf is social golf - official club competitions included. The impact is the non-effect on Handicap Indexes caused by the non-submission of acceptable scores that should be forming part of the players' handicap records.

You just said they weren't involved in club sport outside their affiliated competitions, now you're saying they are.
 
Obfuscate all you like; we're talking about regular organised competitions, not a group of mates having a side bet in their weekly fourball.
I thought the discussion was about E.G. trying to mandate what occurs between a group who throw a few quid into the pot every weekend and have an agreement amongst themselves that winners get an unofficial cut the week after. E.G. appear to be dictating that would be classed as having 2 handicaps, no Colonel Warpington-Smythe, I have one handicap and this week I am knocking a couple of strokes off that because I won a tenner last weekend.
 
Obfuscate all you like; we're talking about regular organised competitions, not a group of mates having a side bet in their weekly fourball.

Well that’s what our swindle is - a bunch of mates playing in fourballs , having side bets

That’s our social golf

Then we have competition golf where we enter a golf competition run by the club and all the rewards that come with that
 
Unless you're doing it wrong, (almost) all golf is social golf - official club competitions included. The impact is the non-effect on Handicap Indexes caused by the non-submission of acceptable scores that should be forming part of the players' handicap records.
This doesnt stack up though. If it were a valid reason, then one could ask how did we manage at all before WHS. The truth is that it is not coming from a concern that handicaps would be distorted from non submission of roll up scores, but is coming from conforming to a new system for conformance sake alone. This is why it makes no sense, and the EG exhortation is seen for the hollowness that it is. The logic is - Americans put in cards all the time, so you must. And that isnt washing.
(
- Oh right, so gimmes and breakfast balls too then ?
- NO ! How dare you ! Rule 43.2.6b subsection 3f says no breakfast balls ! Do you want me to quote it too you again !?
)
 
This doesnt stack up though. If it were a valid reason, then one could ask how did we manage at all before WHS. The truth is that it is not coming from a concern that handicaps would be distorted from non submission of roll up scores, but is coming from conforming to a new system for conformance sake alone. This is why it makes no sense, and the EG exhortation is seen for the hollowness that it is. The logic is - Americans put in cards all the time, so you must. And that isnt washing.
(
- Oh right, so gimmes and breakfast balls too then ?
- NO ! How dare you ! Rule 43.2.6b subsection 3f says no breakfast balls ! Do you want me to quote it too you again !?
)


Sorry but what’s a breakfast ball ?
 
Well that’s what our swindle is - a bunch of mates playing in fourballs , having side bets

That’s our social golf

Then we have competition golf where we enter a golf competition run by the club and all the rewards that come with that
Your earlier description of your swindle was obviously that of of a regular organised competition not casual golf with a few sidebets.
 
Your earlier description of your swindle was obviously that of of a regular organised competition not casual golf with a few sidebets.

We turn up , we play in fourballs , sidebets , gimmies , pick and place , £2 in the pot , half to charity the other half a team prize - very much casual

Suspect most swindles work the same way
 
You just said they weren't involved in club sport outside their affiliated competitions, now you're saying they are.
No I didn't and no I didn't.
I said that they don't involve themselves in the conduct of friendly/social matches at the lowest level of local club sport.
I then said that they mostly care that clubs are looking after kids and the vulnerable (safeguarding) and actively encourage clubs to organise more non-competitive formats to encourage participation.
Unless you're doing it wrong, (almost) all golf is social golf - official club competitions included. The impact is the non-effect on Handicap Indexes caused by the non-submission of acceptable scores that should be forming part of the players' handicap records.
For me all golf is social golf.
But I don't treat every round of golf the same.
For some it would seem that there are only 3 types of golfer: the honest golfer; the handicap cheating bandit; the low handicap protecting vanity golfer.
In reality they are many types.

I'm a type that mostly plays social non-competitive golf with pals.
A couple of us rarely keep score but we generally play to the rules of golf. I don't like gimmes; I like to complete each hole. If we're playing badly, we sometimes scramble the back 9. I'm not playing in a way where I'm trying to get my best individual score.

Occasionally I'll be in a group that is an informal society. We will have a competition at mine or another course. There will be nominal prizes. Those with WHS handicaps will use them. Those without will be given a fair handicap. It's a bit of fun but played to the rules of golf. I'll be trying to hit longest drives on every hole and taking on every improbable hero shot. I'm not playing in a way where I'm trying to get my best individual score.

Sometimes I play in official club comps. I try to get my best score. That's what my WHS handicap is for.

If I was submitting those other rounds towards my HI then I would probably be playing off 20 rather than 15 and it would give me an unfair advantage in the official comps.

I like WHS and I mostly have no complaints about the governing authority or local committee at my club. But they don't need to involve themselves in my private golf.

Edited stupid spelling autocorrect. 😎
 
Last edited:
Sorry but what’s a breakfast ball ?
This is an example of how WHS hasnt been fully or well communicated. People in the UK are still posing questions like this.
EG needs to provider better education on the distinction between breakfast balls and say mulligans. The rules are very precise in many respects as has been quoted here. But lack detail such as until what time of the morning to breakfast balls apply, and after that, how many mulligans may o e take, do they apply to tee shots only or any full shot, etc. ? This could be the grease that frees WHS to work properly here and have people comfortable submitting scores in swindles knowing they can keep their handicap in a reasonable window to match their competition score, played with stricter rules.
 
Have read a fair bit, does feel like definitions shift about in different circumstances.

If say 8, 12, whatever, players are booking 2 or 3 tee times and sorting out by the tee or putting green the fun for the day and chucking a few coins in for that - feels like no change & no need. Club is oblivious.

Other end of spectrum, some clubs have known roll ups/swindles/whatever where the pro shop/club are complicit with putting tee times aside. Maybe passing contact details to new joiners etc. And these groups are say playing singles stableford for some cash. Then seems fairly sensible they become types of competition. Just seen as members organising them to take admin pressure away from club.

Then there's all the variations in between, where it becomes interesting... 😬
 
Have read a fair bit, does feel like definitions shift about in different circumstances.

If say 8, 12, whatever, players are booking 2 or 3 tee times and sorting out by the tee or putting green the fun for the day and chucking a few coins in for that - feels like no change & no need. Club is oblivious.

Other end of spectrum, some clubs have known roll ups/swindles/whatever where the pro shop/club are complicit with putting tee times aside. Maybe passing contact details to new joiners etc. And these groups are say playing singles stableford for some cash. Then seems fairly sensible they become types of competition. Just seen as members organising them to take admin pressure away from club.

Then there's all the variations in between, where it becomes interesting... 😬
Tee times blocked out for a 'Roll-up' means this is regarded as 'official' by the Club so scores should defo go in...... back room fiddling for the money is pretty pointless if scores are routinely going in then H/caps will reflect results... rather time this 'old-boy' stuff was done with & welcome to the New-world of up-front golf!!
 
Tee times blocked out for a 'Roll-up' means this is regarded as 'official' by the Club so scores should defo go in.....
Absolute stuff and nonsense, Our roll up times are blocked off so any member knows they can go and get a social game.
The roll up isn't played according to the RoG so is not used for HCap.
If some pink trousered pimp trys to tell us to put a card in he's liable to get a three iron stuffed where the sun doesn't shine.
 
Top