D
Deleted member 29109
Guest
Yep, it’s clubs next.I do fully imagine this is a first step, and opens the door pretty easily to some more changes down the line
Yep, it’s clubs next.I do fully imagine this is a first step, and opens the door pretty easily to some more changes down the line
Now that would be very costly & a huge mistakeYep, it’s clubs next.
Not sure that it will waste any of my time or money, nor most people that play. It might take some time and money for ball manufacturers but they were going to spend that anyway, they just have a different set of rules to be measured against.It's a monumental waste of time, and money.
At least it makes golf continue to look stupid to those outside the game, we wouldn't want that threatened would we....
It might mean they are one club longer into the green, but for them hitting a 6 iron instead of a 7 iron makes zero difference, whereas for me it's chalk and cheese.
Yes.. for two or three years I didn't even carry a 6 iron because I couldn't hit it. I do now and can sometimes but it's one of my least confident clubs still.Chalk and cheese…..really? It’s 1 club
9 iron instead of pitching wedge then?Yes.. for two or three years I didn't even carry a 6 iron because I couldn't hit it. I do now and can sometimes but it's one of my least confident clubs still.
But that was you, with a 6 iron. Having a club we struggle with isn't unusual, for example with me for far too long it's been hybrids...any.Yes.. for two or three years I didn't even carry a 6 iron because I couldn't hit it. I do now and can sometimes but it's one of my least confident clubs still.
I will be 73 by then so any old crap might do depending if my game deterioratesYou worried your stash of balls that may be getting "illegal" will still be around by 2030?
It would be interesting to know which current balls are in the 30% that conform now.I will be 73 by then so any old crap might do depending if my game deteriorates
Just thinking if a half decent ball is on the list we could just swap now and get used to it.
That might put us at a disadvantage but it might not.
Plenty of longer hitters think it's good - it doesn't go anywhere near far enough to be great.Seems like a lot of short hitters think the roll back is great. Maybe there is a bit of green eyed monster involved![]()
The most influential OEMs rejected just that proposal.If us recreational golfers are going to lose 5 yards or less, what is the point?
Am I going to buy new golf balls to replace the dozens out in my garage (no)
As it is, I find many more balls than I loose.
Really can't understand why this wasn't just applied to the professional game only.
A very strange & wrong decision.
Yes.. for two or three years I didn't even carry a 6 iron because I couldn't hit it. I do now and can sometimes but it's one of my least confident clubs still.
I think it’s going to be the lower compression ones.It would be interesting to know which current balls are in the 30% that conform now.
A soft ball, think Callaway Supersoft, hit hard (120) is going to squash so much that it's going tomuse a lot of it's energy regaining it's shape, energy that ls lost which reduces distance.I think it’s going to be the lower compression ones.
So a 120mph can’t get the ball speed to hit 317+ yds but a 95 mph can optimise it.
Just guessing.
If you had to hit a club longer into every single green, your percentage of greens hit would go down. That's just common sense.I just don’t think there is a noticeable difference on hitting the green at those clubs for a 15 handicap golfer.
If you had to hit a club longer into every single green, your percentage of greens hit would go down. That's just common sense.![]()