Radical thoughts for the WHS article

Golfnut1957

Newbie
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
1,490
Visit site
I've always had an issue with matchplay being used for handicaps....and I hope it doesn't come into force here....
At an Old Pharts vs Whippersnappers gig a few years back, I partnered a now ex- forumer in the 4bbb.
I contributed nothing...Zero...not a sausage....not even a putt for a half.....
How can a display like that be used to determine a handicap..?
How can a "most likely score" be generated from playing 1/4 of a round..?
It would get even more complicated than that. What about matches that finish early. What about our last truly competitive round which was anything but.

We played Greensomes, both drive, choose the best one and play alternative shots from there. We got smashed 7&6, both played terrible, nowhere near our handicaps. They played very well, certainly better than their handicaps would suggest.

So Mr Handicap secretary, how are you sorting that one out?
 

Golfnut1957

Newbie
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
1,490
Visit site
Actually it might not be the worst idea that every round is automatically reflected on your handicap record - even if you choose not to submit your card afterwards. Many people posting here seem to just play a few rounds for the "lols" between "serious" rounds. If you saw that someone had played 10 "practice" rounds since their last card vs someone who has submitted their last 10 cards you'd be able to form an opinion on that person and the validity of their handicap.
And as has been asked already what about those people who neither play for "lols" nor for practice but who choose to play competitive matches instead.

Or what do you think of the golfer who instead of playing 10 "practice" rounds spends all of his time at the range practising. Is the validity of his handicap questionable too?
 

sweaty sock

Hacker
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
1,147
Visit site
Old system used to work (in that general play rounds were rare). Everybody turned up on the same day, played the same course, and there was an adjustment for the difficulty of weather, pin placement, speed of greens, length of rough etc etc.

If you didnt play enough, your handicap clearly stated this and you often couldnt play in events with decent prizes.

It suited the golfing culture very well.

Maybe the idea is to change the golfing culture to encourage more players? Would be interesting as covid grew the game exponentially, lets see how we hold the interest of new players....
 

WGCRider

Newbie
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
290
Visit site
And as has been asked already what about those people who neither play for "lols" nor for practice but who choose to play competitive matches instead.

Or what do you think of the golfer who instead of playing 10 "practice" rounds spends all of his time at the range practising. Is the validity of his handicap questionable too?

If you asking do I think differently about people who use the practice facilities for practice vs those that keep "forgetting" to register their general play round - then the answer is yes.
 

mikejohnchapman

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
1,944
Location
Dorset
Visit site
It would get even more complicated than that. What about matches that finish early. What about our last truly competitive round which was anything but.

We played Greensomes, both drive, choose the best one and play alternative shots from there. We got smashed 7&6, both played terrible, nowhere near our handicaps. They played very well, certainly better than their handicaps would suggest.

So Mr Handicap secretary, how are you sorting that one out?
No problem with matches that finish early - just use the current WHS formula for holes not played (you have to play at least 10 to win or loose).

Have not seen anyone suggesting foresomes or greensomes will be acceptable for handicap. Maybe this is the "Baldrick cunning plan" to fix pace of play!
 

IanM

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
12,201
Location
Monmouthshire, UK via Guildford!
www.newportgolfclub.org.uk
No problem with matches that finish early - just use the current WHS formula for holes not played (you have to play at least 10 to win or loose).



Have not seen anyone suggesting foresomes or greensomes will be acceptable for handicap. Maybe this is the "Baldrick cunning plan" to fix pace of play!



Handicapping on holes not played is hilarious 🤣 Given that directive, foresomes can't be far behind, especially as, if you can count a hole "not played" ...surely you can count half a hole!:ROFLMAO:
 

AussieKB

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
851
Location
Australia
Visit site
In OZ they have 9 hole twilight comps, then they add two together for 18 holes, does not matter that they are played on different courses (crazy) and could be weeks apart, just so long as they happen within the last 20 scores.

Each club decides if they want to use this method, as it is not mandatory.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,222
Visit site
When the Wednesday Seniors Roll up became qualifying, a large group stopped playing in it. They said two qualifying comps a week was plenty!
Same thing happened with our Thursday rollup - by far the largest club rollup - the large majority playing in it being seniors. When it was decided it should be a WHS qualifier the numbers dropped from 60-70 to about 40. Many just didn’t want to put in a card when playing in it.
 

evemccc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,594
Visit site
Old system used to work (in that general play rounds were rare). Everybody turned up on the same day, played the same course, and there was an adjustment for the difficulty of weather, pin placement, speed of greens, length of rough etc etc.

If you didnt play enough, your handicap clearly stated this and you often couldnt play in events with decent prizes.

It suited the golfing culture very well.

Maybe the idea is to change the golfing culture to encourage more players? Would be interesting as covid grew the game exponentially, lets see how we hold the interest of new players....

Certainly fits into ‘modern thinking’ on how organisations / sports clubs / modern society operate

Hack off your core constituency, to chase an ephemeral new market to make money, dressed up as inclusivity and ‘growing the game’
 

Banchory Buddha

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Messages
2,018
Visit site
Certainly fits into ‘modern thinking’ on how organisations / sports clubs / modern society operate

Hack off your core constituency, to chase an ephemeral new market to make money, dressed up as inclusivity and ‘growing the game’
Yup, it's absolute drivel. Your casual or even non-golfer isn't suddenly going to go "oh wow, now I can get a golf handicap without entering competitions, where do I sign up?"

Honest tae god, what a farcical state we've got into
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,018
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Yup, it's absolute drivel. Your casual or even non-golfer isn't suddenly going to go "oh wow, now I can get a golf handicap without entering competitions, where do I sign up?"
Are you sure, because it would seem that tens of thousands have done precisely that (e.g. over 25,000 have joined England Golf's iGolf scheme).
 

evemccc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,594
Visit site
Yup, it's absolute drivel. Your casual or even non-golfer isn't suddenly going to go "oh wow, now I can get a golf handicap without entering competitions, where do I sign up?"

Honest tae god, what a farcical state we've got into

Cricket lovers have had to put up with this sort of bilge for years 🙄😡
 

sweaty sock

Hacker
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
1,147
Visit site
Are you sure, because it would seem that tens of thousands have done precisely that (e.g. over 25,000 have joined England Golf's iGolf scheme).

Honest question, hows that going? There was alot of hearsay that many open comps wouldnt welcome igolfers? As I refuse to sign up to golf empire ive now way to check if thats true or not!
 
Top