• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 35927
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is that the video where they use a light aircraft that's capable of taking off from stationary into a moderate breeze?
Yes and it takes off exactly as it did every other time. Is the weight important, it's either takes off or it doesn't
 
The plane is moving forwards relative to earth (relative to me, if I was stood on stationary ground, watching it)
Ffs. So the conveyor isn't reversing against the wheels to keep the plane stationary; it's rolling forwards at high speed and the wheels aren't moving at all, like Crow said earlier.
What a waste of brain energy! 🤣
 
Ffs. So the conveyor isn't reversing against the wheels to keep the plane stationary; it's rolling forwards at high speed and the wheels aren't moving at all, like Crow said earlier.
What a waste of brain energy! 🤣

Thought the initial meme said the conveyor belt matches the speed in the opposite direction
 
Ffs. So the conveyor isn't reversing against the wheels to keep the plane stationary; it's rolling forwards at high speed and the wheels aren't moving at all, like Crow said earlier.
What a waste of brain energy! 🤣
As I've said several times, whatever the treadmill is doing or is programmed to do (as per OP), it is irrelevant. It won't resist the thrust against the air by the engine.

So many comments have been made, and so many of my comments have been spin offs / responses to those.

I think my biggest surprise is that some genuinely seem to believe a treadmill can effectively cancel out the thrust of a jet engine, and keep the plane stationary
 
As I've said several times, whatever the treadmill is doing or is programmed to do (as per OP), it is irrelevant. It won't resist the thrust against the air by the engine.

So many comments have been made, and so many of my comments have been spin offs / responses to those.

I think my biggest surprise is that some genuinely seem to believe a treadmill can effectively cancel out the thrust of a jet engine, and keep the plane stationary
So what's the craic with referencing the Mythbusters video, in which the "treadmill" goes in the opposite direction to the plane and the treadmill speed and wheel speeds are clearly not matched?
 
So what's the craic with referencing the Mythbusters video, in which the "treadmill" goes in the opposite direction to the plane and the treadmill speed and wheel speeds are clearly not matched?
That's how treadmills work , the opposite of where youre going
 
So what's the craic with referencing the Mythbusters video, in which the "treadmill" goes in the opposite direction to the plane and the treadmill speed and wheel speeds are clearly not matched?
Nor will they be matched in the OP. Which I've already discussed.

They may be programmed to try and achieve the same speed. But, the OP doesn't say they achieve the same speed. As soon as an outside force (thrust) propels aircraft forwards, the wheels speed up. The treadmill will speed up based on it's programming, but that just speeds wheels up even more, etc.

Mind you, OP never says engine is used to propel plane forwards. So, the speeds will definitely match up if they are both moving at 0mph. The plane would not take off if that were the case :)
 
For those asking to see video evidence, there isn't a conveyor belt long enough to film it (as I imagine you all know) but try this:

A planes is on skis.
The skis represent the section of the conveyor under the planes wheels.
As the plane accelerates the conveyor belt/skis speed up to match the speed of the plane and so the wheels don't turn.
The plane reaches take off speed (as does the conveyor belt) and up she goes!
It isn't a treadmill, it's a conveyor belt.

Now watch the video.

 
Ok. Figured out that I believe Swango and Pete think this thing works very differently.
Swango sees is that the wheels are not rotating but the conveyor belt is travelling at high speed until the plane reaches normal take off speed.
Pete sees is that the plane remains stationary relative to a bystander and airspeed required for takeoff is achieved by airflow across the wings generated by the jet engines.
Is that an accurate summary?
 
Ok. Figured out that I believe Swango and Pete think this thing works very differently.
Swango sees is that the wheels are not rotating but the conveyor belt is travelling at high speed until the plane reaches normal take off speed.
Pete sees is that the plane remains stationary relative to a bystander and airspeed required for takeoff is achieved by airflow across the wings generated by the jet engines.
Is that an accurate summary?
No, the plane moves forward and takes off as it would any other time. It's a straight forward take off, no magic or jiggery pokery.
No what ifs, just simple physics and the laws of motion
 
Ok. Figured out that I believe Swango and Pete think this thing works very differently.
Swango sees is that the wheels are not rotating but the conveyor belt is travelling at high speed until the plane reaches normal take off speed.
Pete sees is that the plane remains stationary relative to a bystander and airspeed required for takeoff is achieved by airflow across the wings generated by the jet engines.
Is that an accurate summary?
Not on my part.

I believe the treadmill is running very quickly in the opposite direction to the plane. But, it does nothing to slow the plane down, and the engines thrust it forward and it takes off in the normal way a plane takes off
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top