Apart from a few years ago when there was a few models given contracts by the rag, ie, early 80’s Sam Fox aged 16, given a 4 year contract. The latter years the models worked for/or were employed by a modelling agency who sold the rights for an individual picture, it was the agency who had the contract.
I remember an interview with one of the girls a few years ago. She wasn't happy about losing some of her income and she also said she never felt exploited. Think from memory it was Linda Lusardi.
Probably not her mate as she finished page 3 in 1988 and it wasn’t stopped by the rag until 2015.
Either way, it wasn't the models that wanted it stopped.
For me it is not specifically about the page 3 girls at all - it's about the mindset framed in those boys and men looking at the photographs of half naked young women on page 3 in a national newspaper. As soon as you make it about the page 3 girls themselves you are missing the whole point that I was making when bringing up page 3 - and that those who campaigned against page 3 girls were making and for which for their troubles they were roundly abused and dismissed as 'kill joy' libbers - just as some these days choose to attack those who are woke.
Sweet god man, don’t give folk ideas ??
https://amp.theguardian.com/society...how-the-word-woke-was-weaponised-by-the-rightI’m guessing “woke” is some new buzz word for certain people to latch on
What does it mean ?
...and I commented generally...
Harry should be ashamed, sat there like a nodding dog grimacing in fake outrage. Never had a proper job in his life, privileged beyond belief and no wonder the British Army never let him anywhere near the front line.He did end up on the Front line for a short period until the media got hold of itPiers will be back on GB News and more vocal than ever, trust me. It's a done deal. More viewers, more money, he'll be the winner and so will the public.
I personally found his behaviour on GMB pretty shameful on some issues and brilliant on others.
His comments on Megan Markle were right in parts. She played the victim card with the usual buzz words designed to generate outrage to an American audience. Making accusations without naming anyone is a cowardly move. Regarding her mental health no one will know and Piers was wrong to focus on that.
But stuff like being a prisoner when she was out in London every week, private jets to the French Riviera or New York having a good time is laughable. Her turnover of private staff in a short space of time is unheard of in history.
For a couple who hate publicity the interview was a spin doctors dream, no negative questions just a free reign to twist the narrative. How can she talk about family when she's ghosted most of her own
