Newton
New member
Apologies.
I know there’s another similar titled thread on the forum at the moment but I feel the subject matter is a little different to this one.
I’ve been a member at my local club for around 10 years now.
We have 3 categories of membership:
7 day – gents only, includes Saturday competition day
5 and 6 day – open to gents and ladies
I am 5 day member. I am only able to play midweek golf due to family commitments at weekends. My fees are the same as a lady 5 day member.
Likewise the 6 day membership fees for gents and ladies are the same.
We have a thriving Ladies section and they have a longstanding arrangement of a block booking on Tues mornings for their own competition.
Previously, gents could have expected to access the 1st tee just after 12pm on Tues but due to the expanding lady membership this block booking now runs from 9am through to 1.15pm.
In summer this does not present a problem, but at this time of year, it’s going dark by 3.45pm, and therefore impossible for my midweek 4 ball to play anywhere near a full round.
We feel we have in effect lost 20% of our playing privileges as we can no longer access the course on Tuesdays.
I don’t want to appear as some kind of misogynist. I have welcomed the growth in the Ladies section at our club. But in pure black and white terms, I am paying the same fees as a lady 5 day member but enjoying considerably less access to the course than my female equivalent.
I’m pretty sure there would be cries of “sex discrimination” if the shoe were on the other foot and ladies were being asked to pay the same as gents but for less playing access.
A lady who I broached this with retorted “but gents have their Saturday competition day”.
But surely that’s an irrelevance and not ‘comparing apples with apples’? 7 day members pay a considerable premium for their extra day’s golf.
Is it unreasonable to either look for parity with a lady who pays the same fees as myself or an adjustment to membership fees to acknowledge different playing privileges?
I’m pretty sure this issue must have cropped up elsewhere. Any observations would be welcomed.
Thanks.
I know there’s another similar titled thread on the forum at the moment but I feel the subject matter is a little different to this one.
I’ve been a member at my local club for around 10 years now.
We have 3 categories of membership:
7 day – gents only, includes Saturday competition day
5 and 6 day – open to gents and ladies
I am 5 day member. I am only able to play midweek golf due to family commitments at weekends. My fees are the same as a lady 5 day member.
Likewise the 6 day membership fees for gents and ladies are the same.
We have a thriving Ladies section and they have a longstanding arrangement of a block booking on Tues mornings for their own competition.
Previously, gents could have expected to access the 1st tee just after 12pm on Tues but due to the expanding lady membership this block booking now runs from 9am through to 1.15pm.
In summer this does not present a problem, but at this time of year, it’s going dark by 3.45pm, and therefore impossible for my midweek 4 ball to play anywhere near a full round.
We feel we have in effect lost 20% of our playing privileges as we can no longer access the course on Tuesdays.
I don’t want to appear as some kind of misogynist. I have welcomed the growth in the Ladies section at our club. But in pure black and white terms, I am paying the same fees as a lady 5 day member but enjoying considerably less access to the course than my female equivalent.
I’m pretty sure there would be cries of “sex discrimination” if the shoe were on the other foot and ladies were being asked to pay the same as gents but for less playing access.
A lady who I broached this with retorted “but gents have their Saturday competition day”.
But surely that’s an irrelevance and not ‘comparing apples with apples’? 7 day members pay a considerable premium for their extra day’s golf.
Is it unreasonable to either look for parity with a lady who pays the same fees as myself or an adjustment to membership fees to acknowledge different playing privileges?
I’m pretty sure this issue must have cropped up elsewhere. Any observations would be welcomed.
Thanks.