Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Me neither, never played there, or ever likely to, but I can't fathom why it would overtake other top courses. That's where i struggle with the subjectivity. These movements suggests inconsistency too, i.e. different criteria, or different interpretations, being used, year on year.
I see the criteria is quality of test and design (35%). Conditioning and presentation (30%), visual appeal, internally and externally (15%), and finally the club’s facilities and the overall visitor experience (each 10%).
So, to jump in ranking a course itself must either have been improved/redesigned in the last year (not for TOC as far as I am aware, but may be wrong), be in a better condition, relative to peers (again unlikely given all these courses will be impeccably maintained and have investment in facilities, decor etc.) or potentially (but only accounting for 10%) have poorer facilities or less welcoming staff etc, than they did a year ago.
I can't see this being the case for many of the top courses to be honest so am struggling to understand why there are as many movements as there are.
Can anyone suggest any reasons why St Andrews is now a better course than it was 12 months or so ago?
It potentially needs to do nothing if the course it overtook let its standards slip a little, and it will be fine margins at this level.