Robster59
Tour Rookie
Check out the reviews and forget about the brand.Is that a good buy for a Wilson ball......
Check out the reviews and forget about the brand.Is that a good buy for a Wilson ball......
The Triad ball is getting a lot of traction and good reviews online as an 'all-rounder' with decent distance and spin, and mid-compression. I've just started using it and loving it so far.Is that a good buy for a Wilson ball......
I’m very happy with the Triad ball but I might give the Staff ball a try next summer . I would really like a ball fitting , my mate off 2 had one and loved it . Think they recommended Callaway Chrome Soft for him . Trouble is our Pro doesn’t stock Wilson ballsI have been using the Staff Model X ball for a couple of years. Before that was the Staff Model ball before they released newer versions. They are a quality ball. Not tried the Triad but for the price point I am sure it will give good numbers
I've never done a ball fitting - and I'm sure it's all well and good, but if the best ball for me turned out to be the ProV1 I'd probably say thanks but no thanks, I'm not spending 50 quid a box.I’m very happy with the Triad ball but I might give the Staff ball a try next summer . I would really like a ball fitting , my mate off 2 had won and loved it . Think they recommended Callaway Chrome Soft for him . Trouble is our Pro doesn’t stock Wilson balls
I must admit I would be the sameI've never done a ball fitting - and I'm sure it's all well and good, but if the best ball for me turned out to be the ProV1 I'd probably say thanks but no thanks, I'm not spending 50 quid a box.I'll stick with the Triad at a very respectable £30-ish price point.
A local 9 hole muni. I bought itWhat golf pro shop was this?
A local 9 hole muni. I bought it
I've never done a ball fitting - and I'm sure it's all well and good, but if the best ball for me turned out to be the ProV1 I'd probably say thanks but no thanks, I'm not spending 50 quid a box.I'll stick with the Triad at a very respectable £30-ish price point.
I think that’s one of the best statements that a lot of club golfers need to consider.Can you really tell the difference?
I’m generalising, but most manufacturers make two premium urethane cover balls, a softer one and a harder one. Pro V1 and V1X. TP5 and TP5x. Etc.
If you work out which one is better for you then it doesn’t make that much difference what brand you use. Obviously doesn’t 100% hold true. And manufacturers are blurring the lines now with balls like the Tour Response.
Sums up my point perfectly well.I've broken 80 with a pro v1 and with a srixon soft feel. Also probably shot over 90 with both.
Genuinely cannot tell any difference so I play with whatever I find and looks in good nick.
Not saying that nobody can tell a difference but I reckon a lot are deluding themselves
I once read that the TP5 has 5 layers with the core being the innermost, and that to get the best performance out of the ball you had to compress the inner core. However, in order to compress the inner core you needed tour level club head speed which very few possess, thus making the ball pointless for the average amateur.I think that’s one of the best statements that a lot of club golfers need to consider.
So many players are using premium balls because reviews say so, because a certain pro does or because of golfing snobbery having to play the best brand. Rather than actually play what’s best for them.
Majority of club players do not need to be playing a Pro V1 or TP5 of any variant. When they would be better suited to a cheaper ball that maximise their distance or lack of control.
It’s actually refreshing seeing people on here choosing something like the Triad or similar than just playing what the big boys do!
Exactly hardly worth it for 95% of club golfers. The exception being very low players that do compress it properly.I once read that the TP5 has 5 layers with the core being the innermost, and that to get the best performance out of the ball you had to compress the inner core. However, in order to compress the inner core you needed tour level club head speed which very few possess, thus making the ball pointless for the average amateur.
I only ever use one new ball a round, if I loose it then it’s something that I have found or used before out the bag.I’d argue a lot of single figure players do just as well with a similar ball to the mid price range. Just couple of weeks played with a lad whom I often play with and he bought a dozen Pro V1 before teeing off, proceeded to lose 3 of them on the first hole slices into the trees. Then lost a further 5 balls during the rest of the round again sliced into the never, never or into ponds on the course. When asked why he plays them! His answer was he likes the feel and spin he gets, he plays off of 33 and trust me he gets no spin apart from a shed load of side spin with every tee shot. But he’s a good lad and it’s his money.
Yeah, I agree to some extent. When choosing the Triad as my new ball, I looked at the MyGolfSpy testing and picked out the ones that were medium compression, good distance for my swing speed and decent spin but not too much - and then Triad was the cheapest of the ones I selected so I went with that. As you say, it does what I want and I doubt I'd notice the two extra yards the ProV1 might give me, for the cost of £20 extra per box.Can you really tell the difference?
I’m generalising, but most manufacturers make two premium urethane cover balls, a softer one and a harder one. Pro V1 and V1X. TP5 and TP5x. Etc.
If you work out which one is better for you then it doesn’t make that much difference what brand you use. Obviously doesn’t 100% hold true. And manufacturers are blurring the lines now with balls like the Tour Response.