MGS...again.

[Orikoru]

What's your point ?

He's right isn't he ?

They don't spin by magic on their own.

 

[ger147]

What's your point ?

He's right isn't he ?

Depends on who's hitting them...

 

[robinthehood]

My mate only uses prov1’s as they “spin more on the green”
He plays off 28

That will be true.

 

[User20204]

They aren’t benefiting him one bit.
It’s just good marketing from Titleist.
He’d be much better off playing a cheaper ball & spending the money on lessons.
FACT 👍🏻

In what respect is he not benefiting ? They've proved there is very little distance difference off the tee.

 

[Pin-seeker]

They don't spin by magic on their own.

So you’re saying that they won’t moonwalk back to the hole for a hacker?

Nah sorry I’m not having it 🤣

 

[Pin-seeker]

In what respect is he not benefiting ? They've proved there is very little distance difference off the tee.

Sorry but what’s you’re point?

 

[Dando]

In what respect is he not benefiting ? They've proved there is very little distance difference off the tee.

He’s not benefitting as its costing him a fortune in balls!

 

[Pin-seeker]

If he’s minted then crack on,but he’s definitely wasting his money.

 

[User20204]

Sorry but what’s you’re point?

Oh we're playing games, I like games 🙄

Sorry but petty childish games on the internet are not for me.

 

[Pin-seeker]

Oh we're playing games, I like games 🙄

Sorry but petty childish games on the internet are not for me.

Was a genuine question 🤷‍♂️

You say little difference in distance.
I say no noticeable difference overall for a 28 handicapper.

But if you want to throw a childish strop 😉

 

[Imurg]

The only reason a 28'er should be playing a premium ball is if they can afford it.
As they're off 28, they probably lose quite a few balls per round and their ball striking possibly isn't too good
The added benefits of using a premium will be offset by the losses and poor strikes.
The better you get, the more you will benefit from the better ball - as long as the cost isn't prohibitive
But if the cheap ball has an unbalanced core or cover then it's going to help nobody and could well be one of the reasons balls don't go where they're aimed.

 

[User20204]

The only reason a 28'er should be playing a premium ball is if they can afford it.
As they're off 28, they probably lose quite a few balls per round and their ball striking possibly isn't too good

Interestingly I think different, I play off 4 and probably lose more balls in a month than your average 28 handicapper does in a year, in my experience, they don't hit it far enough to lose many balls, a PP of mine plays off 12 and hasn't lost a ball in two years, he's not long enough to. In regards if they can afford it, again, I'd say the opposite, they should NOT play a top ball if they couldn't afford it.

 

[User20204]

But if the cheap ball has an unbalanced core or cover then it's going to help nobody and could well be one of the reasons balls don't go where they're aimed.

That was one of the very things MGS said in their ball test chat video.

 

[Orikoru]

Interestingly I think different, I play off 4 and probably lose more balls in a month than your average 28 handicapper does in a year, in my experience, they don't hit it far enough to lose many balls, a PP of mine plays off 12 and hasn't lost a ball in two years, he's not long enough to. In regards if they can afford it, again, I'd say the opposite, they should NOT play a top ball if they couldn't afford it.

Well that is complete rubbish..? High handicaps lose balls by slicing them into the trees, topping them into lakes and ditches, blading through a green and into the woods. What the hell are you going on about, you only lose balls by hitting them far??

 

[howbow88]

Interestingly I think different, I play off 4 and probably lose more balls in a month than your average 28 handicapper does in a year, in my experience, they don't hit it far enough to lose many balls, a PP of mine plays off 12 and hasn't lost a ball in two years, he's not long enough to.

 

[Pin-seeker]

Interestingly I think different, I play off 4 and probably lose more balls in a month than your average 28 handicapper does in a year, in my experience, they don't hit it far enough to lose many balls, a PP of mine plays off 12 and hasn't lost a ball in two years, he's not long enough to. In regards if they can afford it, again, I'd say the opposite, they should NOT play a top ball if they couldn't afford it.

Yeah that’s definitely a different way of thinking 🤪

I’m guessing the 12 handicapper doesn’t play much?

 

[Slime]

Interestingly I think different, I play off 4 and probably lose more balls in a month than your average 28 handicapper does in a year, in my experience, they don't hit it far enough to lose many balls, a PP of mine plays off 12 and hasn't lost a ball in two years, he's not long enough to. In regards if they can afford it, again, I'd say the opposite, they should NOT play a top ball if they couldn't afford it.

Are you saying that he hasn't played for two years or does he play on a course with no rough, no water and no trees?

 

[User20204]

Plays 2/3 times a week, straightest hitter in golf, no sure what all this has to do with MGS and companies saying they produce balls when they don't as we seem to have digressed somewhat.

 

[Pin-seeker]

Plays 2/3 times a week, straightest hitter in golf, no sure what all this has to do with MGS and companies saying they produce balls when they don't as we seem to have digressed somewhat.

Well I’m calling bs on this.

Or maybe he as a hole in his pocket

 

[Dando]

Plays 2/3 times a week, straightest hitter in golf, no sure what all this has to do with MGS and companies saying they produce balls when they don't as we seem to have digressed somewhat.

“Straightest hitter in golf” is quite a statement.
Is he also a “short game wizard?”