What bugs me about the whole thing is she would probably out drive me!!
she's too young to drive
What bugs me about the whole thing is she would probably out drive me!!
i do not think amateurs should be allowed to enter professional tournaments at all,if you wish to enter turn pro and try and make a living,there are plenty of top world class amateur comps to enter.I agree with Liverpool Phil on this one.
She didn't take a place away from anyone. She earnt her place.
i do not think amateurs should be allowed to enter professional tournaments at all,if you wish to enter turn pro and try and make a living,there are plenty of top world class amateur comps to enter.
i do not think amateurs should be allowed to enter professional tournaments at all,if you wish to enter turn pro and try and make a living,there are plenty of top world class amateur comps to enter.
just because it has been going for 65 years does not mean things can not change.So that takes out the Silver Medal in the Open. Only been going since 1949. These players earn their right through a long qualification process in the same way as the pros. Why shouldn't they be there
should LIVERPOOL be able to field a team in the local Sunday league.Why do you think amateurs shouldn't be allowed ?
Do you think non league clubs shouldn't be allowed in the FA Cup also ?
i do not think amateurs should be allowed to enter professional tournaments at all,if you wish to enter turn pro and try and make a living,there are plenty of top world class amateur comps to enter.
should LIVERPOOL be able to field a team in the local Sunday league.
i dont get some of your points,let them play in a pro comp to see if they can handle the pressure before turning pro,WHY !!1- Amateurs should definitely be allowed to enter professional tournaments as it is an excellent way to continue to grow the game.
2- Before turning professional amateurs should know what the pressures are of playing in these events. This will prepare them to be a successful pro (no point in having every amateur fail as no one would then turn professional) and it will make them aware of whether they can actually withstand the pressure.
3- It is a tradition (this has been covered I know but it is still important)
4- They are there on merit. So what if they have the same coaching as the professionals, they still have to play the shots
5- Amateurs don't get paid any tournament winnings so it will only affect a very small number of professionals that don't make the cut ahead of an amateur. Case in point - Shane Lowry won the Irish Open as an amateur but Robert Rock took home the 1st place winners prize
6- If you are a professional but you can't beat an amateur, maybe you should reconsider your chosen profession
Look at the am trying to get into the open how many dq'd or nr'd or wd not a good advert is it.
i never said it was homer,but how many places are taken by amateurs with no hope in hell of ever getting through,but only realise when they are 15 over then W.D after a few holes on the second round,not a good advert,and they do take places from club pros trying to get further up the ladder.Think you should look at regional and final qualifying. Plenty of pros rock up there and then W/D or N/R. Not just the remit of amatuers
i never said it was homer,but how many places are taken by amateurs with no hope in hell of ever getting through,but only realise when they are 15 over then W.D after a few holes on the second round,not a good advert,and they do take places from club pros trying to get further up the ladder.
Sorry but you are talking nonsense
Its called The "Open" for a reason - because its an Open competition and anyone can attempt to play in it - no one is "taking" a place from anyone
Not quite anyone.....you have to be off scratch or lower when you enter........mate of mine played in it last year...didn't do too well, but he said it was the best experience he has ever had...Sorry but you are talking nonsense
Its called The "Open" for a reason - because its an Open competition and anyone can attempt to play in it - no one is "taking" a place from anyone
i dont get some of your points,let them play in a pro comp to see if they can handle the pressure before turning pro,WHY !!
Your missing my point,ALL the top am players are professional amateurs,as in they are sponsored and paid in one way or another,golf is their full time occupation.
there are a few roads to playing on the main tour,so like the football leagues you move up like they do on the euro pro tour.
Was Shane lowry as good as the pros,what did he do the same day he won he turned pro,contract done and dusted sponsor in place,schedule sorted,he was a pro in all but name
Look at the am trying to get into the open how many dq'd or nr'd or wd not a good advert is it.
i do not think amateurs should be allowed to enter professional tournaments at all,if you wish to enter turn pro and try and make a living,there are plenty of top world class amateur comps to enter.
Just playing devils advocate here i have no ax to grind either way, but 6inch has a point. He did not state that they should not play in the open he said Am's should not play in professional tournaments. And i would agree with that.maybe the point that was missed was that the Open is just that Open.![]()
why do you keep mentioning Bobby Jones in your posts.I explained the reason for amateurs being able to see if they can handle the pressure. Not entirely sure why you don't get it.
We understand what you are saying - you have one argument for not letting amateurs play in pro events. That argument is effectively; they are pretty much professionals anyway because of their coaching and sponsorships.
What you don't seem to either understand or even give a s$&* about is the fact that amateurs do not get paid any tournament winnings and are there based on their merit.
Justin Rose played in the open as an amateur and went pro based on his performance. Would he have ever gone pro if he hadn't played in the Open?
If he had turned pro, would he have stuck at it for the first few years when his results were so poor if he hadn't had the result in the Open as an amateur (as this would have given him the belief that he could do it on the tour)?
Would England therefore still still be waiting for a recent English winner of the US Open?