justhitthething
Assistant Pro
there are still a lot of false assumptions about handicapping.
1. it does <u>not</u> create a 'level' playing field. there is an in-built bias (in both CONGU and USGA) toward the lower handicapper. it's not much but it is there.
2. in any competition with a large enough entry the odds are that a high handicapper could shoot a low score.
3. in any one-on-one or low entry competition the odds are that a low handicapper will win.
it's simple statistics. on a par 4 the range of scores for a low handicapper is likely to be 2 to 6 (average 4.?). for a high handicapper the range is 2 to 9 (average 6.?). but both are capable of scoring the 2's and 3's just as both are capable of scoring 5's and 6's.
I do agree, however I cant think of a better way, can you?
Ive played cricket for years before starting golf, and I was only ever able to compete with players of similar ability. Now I can go out in a three ball with a scratch golfer and a 28 handicap golfer and have pretty much an equal chance of winning or losing within that three ball.
Your right about the big field favouring a high handicapper winning. Just as a high turnout means a Labour victory, not everything in life is completely fair.