handicaps are no better

why is it with all of todays tech being put into golf club manufacture along with balls flying further that the average h/cap hasnt improved .
any thoughts on why this is so .I cant come up with any good reason other than maybe people dont practice as much these days as compared to yesteryear.but i cant really see that as an answer. what do you think.?

How strange, I was just talking to my pro about this very point. Apparently golf courses have been made more difficult to keep up with technology.
 
How strange, I was just talking to my pro about this very point. Apparently golf courses have been made more difficult to keep up with technology.

At the highest tour level probably yes. On the courses that the majority of amateur golfers play then I doubt there has been many changes made to make those courses harder as they were becoming too easy.
 
That's interesting, why do you think that? I would have said the higher handicappers get more benefit.

Modern technology can help to mask the effect of a slightly off centre hit, it can do nothing for a terrible swing.

I would say it's not off centre hits that hurt high handicappers, it's massive slices, duffs, losing balls etc. which will happen with whatever equipment you use.

However, if you have a good swing but miss the sweetspot from time to time by a small margin, modern technology helps compensate for that.

It might well help duffers to hit the ball further, probably not in the right direction though.
 
Modern technology can help to mask the effect of a slightly off centre hit, it can do nothing for a terrible swing.

I would say it's not off centre hits that hurt high handicappers, it's massive slices, duffs, losing balls etc. which will happen with whatever equipment you use.

However, if you have a good swing but miss the sweetspot from time to time by a small margin, modern technology helps compensate for that.

It might well help duffers to hit the ball further, probably not in the right direction though.

the first game of golf i played was with an old set of blades and wooded headed woods. my 2nd was with a set of cavity backs and newer larger headed metal driver...

it was far easier 2nd time;)
 
the first game of golf i played was with an old set of blades and wooded headed woods. my 2nd was with a set of cavity backs and newer larger headed metal driver...

it was far easier 2nd time;)

Easier to do what though? Shoot a low score, or hit some shots that made the ball go in the air?

Also, someone having their first round of golf isn't really the right comparator, we're talking about average handicaps so people that have played a fair bit.
 
Easier to do what though? Shoot a low score, or hit some shots that made the ball go in the air?

Also, someone having their first round of golf isn't really the right comparator, we're talking about average handicaps so people that have played a fair bit.

simply the newer clubs were easier to hit
 
Because statistics can be made to convey a point.

How comparable at the two populations? Are you comparing like for like? Do you need to do weighting to make them comparable?

What are the sample sizes and how are they distributed?

If you know about ANOVAs then you know the mean is a pretty weak stat base an argument on.

So why has the mean not changed?

It's damn statistics being the way it is! A pack of lies!
 
And the players that get to cat 1 or scratch or even + all practice (a lot) & all the others are just happy to bash a ball about holding up play & ruining the game.

4255.jpg
 
Top