Smiffy
Grand Slam Winner
I've played with 6 handicappers that are "brilliant". I've also played with a 6 handicapper who is "diabolical".
:lol:
:lol:
I've played with 6 handicappers that are "brilliant". I've also played with a 6 handicapper who is "diabolical".
:lol:
Egg-zactly. The man in the street might well. But only he (assuming he has at least tried to play the game) can take a neutral and unbiased view of golfing ability - and he would say that someone off 10 is a good player. Context is all. No point in asking regular golfers as you'll get a different answer - as we have found - according to ability and handicap.
I've just checked randomly the h'cap lists of 5 clubs in my area. There are 17 players at scratch or better. I didn't look how many members at each club but lets assume 400 as a conservative guess at each. So out of 2000 golfers, 17 are scratch or better (5 of them plus h'caps). That HAS to make them better than just "good" doesn't it?
You can't compare team games with Individual games, a lot of individual games have handicaps, tennis for example at club level has handicaps.
Where do you play tennis with handicaps? My Club everyone played off scratch.![]()
The man in the street is totally irrelevant. The question is being asked of those on this forum.
Where do you play tennis with handicaps? My Club everyone played off scratch.![]()
As 'good' is a relative term and will receive responses biased according to handicap of individual asked - the individuals handicap being the main biasing factor IMO - I tried to take that factor out of the equation by putting the question in the context as if posed to the man in the street. I think in that way you are more likely to achieve a consensus from those on here as most would probably agree that the man in the street would think a 10-18 handicapper is a 'pretty darn good golfer' - and a 6-9 handicapper would be an excellent golfer. Cat 1 - fantastic!
Those on here would have a healthy discussion worthy of a forum post as to whether the man-in-the-street was actually correct with that assessment.
When speaking to people who don't play the game I've heard different opinions on what they consider a "good" player. Just wondered what handicap everyone thinks you have to be to be considered good?
A very sensible post. Context is important and the answer is entirely dependent on who you are asking.
I would argue though that if you frame a question to the man in the street as follows - "is someone a good golfer if you take their score at the end of every hole and then knock one shot off so that they can have a game against better players?" Then I think most people would say probably not.
If you get a shot a hole, you are not a good golfer, irrespective of context. Apologies if this sounds harsh but I believe it is the case.
I've got some interesting views on the 18+s that I find it better to keep to myself![]()