DQ'd late on tee

Unless they were 100% sure the player should have been able to play his round and sort it in the club later before he submits the card , that should have been the very least

That's fine, I've made my point.

I take responsibility for my own actions - what others do is their business.
 
That's fine, I've made my point.

I take responsibility for my own actions - what others do is their business.


nobody is having a go at you mate , well I ain`t for sure , all I am saying these guys need pulling up , how many more rules will they get wrong if they can just spoil someone else day without having to answer , they should be told that unless they 100% sure they should wait till in the club house where they can get the correct ruling that's all
 
nobody is having a go at you mate , well I ain`t for sure , all I am saying these guys need pulling up , how many more rules will they get wrong if they can just spoil someone else day without having to answer , they should be told that unless they 100% sure they should wait till in the club house where they can get the correct ruling that's all

Don't worry, never thought you (or anyone else for that matter) was.
 
Don't worry, never thought you (or anyone else for that matter) was.

Question " is a committee member a committee member when he is on the course playing in a comp or is he just another competitor.?" He is only in authority when the committee is in session. I would not trust anybodys ruling of anything on the golf course and would always call for a ruling when completed round was over. Most of the committee members I know just want to be golfers on the course and will not answer questions on the golf course and rightly so. If you get caught speeding you have a 2/3mph grace because the speedos in most cars are not that accurate so who keeps time on the first tee if there is no starter present a bit of common sense needed here me thinks. you should NOT tee off early if all the competitors are not present. But I agree this guy needs taking down a bit from up his own A*******e. The rule is pretty clear and you need to stand your ground with people like this.
 
Question " is a committee member a committee member when he is on the course playing in a comp or is he just another competitor.?" He is only in authority when the committee is in session. I would not trust anybodys ruling of anything on the golf course and would always call for a ruling when completed round was over. Most of the committee members I know just want to be golfers on the course and will not answer questions on the golf course and rightly so. If you get caught speeding you have a 2/3mph grace because the speedos in most cars are not that accurate so who keeps time on the first tee if there is no starter present a bit of common sense needed here me thinks. you should NOT tee off early if all the competitors are not present. But I agree this guy needs taking down a bit from up his own A*******e. The rule is pretty clear and you need to stand your ground with people like this.

Yes he's a (Club) Committee member. But possibly/probably not a member of The Committee - as defined by The Rules. So simply another competitor when playing in a comp. However, for another member/competitor, his 'office' would mean something. But he is out of date in terms of the Rules - by over 2 years!
 
My friend was DQ'd from the monthly stableford comp this weekend. The reason "Late on tee".

The problem is, he says he was on the tee at 08:21 - tee time was 08:20 and his FC's were walking up to their ball after having tee'd off already. The competitors due off at 08:30 said the other 2 had tee'd off early. My friend waited for them to take their 2nd shots before teeing off himself, but he didn't play his 2nd and picked up to join them on the 2nd tee. It was at this point his FC (the chairman of the handicap committee) said he was late so couldn't join the comp. My friend suggested under rule 32-1 Note 2 he should just blob the first and continue, but the FC was having none of it

Any idea where he stands here? He was well within 5 minutes on the 1st tee, the other guys had more than likely tee'd off early, but he has no way to really confirm he was within 5 mins as he didn't join them until they'd reached the 2nd.

He's going to write to them to get clarification, but if the others had tee'd off before their designated time how can anyone prove they are within 5 minutes if they don't join them until the 2nd?

Not sure this has been answered yet but who actually DQ'd him and when did the DQ happen?

My thinking here, is there a 2nd person on the committee who decided on the DQ outcome because I cant imagine the chairman of the handicap committee (who was playing in the comp) DQ'd him on the 2nd tee box!
 
I've not read all of the thread, but from the OP the thing that screams out at me regardless of the rights and wrongs of the situation with the rules, is that 2 competitors tee'd off early while they were still waiting for a member of their group.

If the comp is running ahead of schedule and everyone's ready fine, get going, but to go without someone before they're late? That would really make my blood boil.
 
Was the player's late start caused by the early start of the others? (That could be an exceptional circumstance depending on the facts.) If not this is a simple case of rule 6-3a. The player should not have been DQ. How to handle the politics of the situation is not covered in the rules.

(The early start of the others is also a breach of 6-3a, but that has not been asked here.)
 
My friend was DQ'd from the monthly stableford comp this weekend. The reason "Late on tee".

The problem is, he says he was on the tee at 08:21 - tee time was 08:20 and his FC's were walking up to their ball after having tee'd off already. The competitors due off at 08:30 said the other 2 had tee'd off early. My friend waited for them to take their 2nd shots before teeing off himself, but he didn't play his 2nd and picked up to join them on the 2nd tee. It was at this point his FC (the chairman of the handicap committee) said he was late so couldn't join the comp. My friend suggested under rule 32-1 Note 2 he should just blob the first and continue, but the FC was having none of it

Any idea where he stands here? He was well within 5 minutes on the 1st tee, the other guys had more than likely tee'd off early, but he has no way to really confirm he was within 5 mins as he didn't join them until they'd reached the 2nd.

He's going to write to them to get clarification, but if the others had tee'd off before their designated time how can anyone prove they are within 5 minutes if they don't join them until the 2nd?

I think your (supposed) fellow competitors must be living in the past! Being late on the tee for a comp used to be a DQ, but the rules have been amended to a 2 shot penalty or loss of hole if up to 5 minutes late and a DQ after that. :mmm:
 
I think your (supposed) fellow competitors must be living in the past! Being late on the tee for a comp used to be a DQ, but the rules have been amended to a 2 shot penalty or loss of hole if up to 5 minutes late and a DQ after that. :mmm:

You should be DQ'd from this thread for being so late with the rule!
 
Was the player's late start caused by the early start of the others? (That could be an exceptional circumstance depending on the facts.) If not this is a simple case of rule 6-3a. The player should not have been DQ. How to handle the politics of the situation is not covered in the rules.

(The early start of the others is also a breach of 6-3a, but that has not been asked here.)

I pointed out above [Post #28] that the player is only late by the clock, not relative to how far he is behind the rest of his group which teed off too early. The OP indicates that the player was 1 minute late for his 0820 start. He might well have been more than 5 minutes behind the group, but that is of no relevance: he is only required to be ready to play at the time designated by the Committee. It is indeed a simple 2 point penalty.

The OP may not have asked about the early start of the other players, but the issue was picked up earlier and it was pointed out then [[Post#12] that they too should be penalised.
 
Last edited:
You should be DQ'd from this thread for being so late with the rule!
I think your (supposed) fellow competitors must be living in the past! Being late on the tee for a comp used to be a DQ, but the rules have been amended to a 2 shot penalty or loss of hole if up to 5 minutes late and a DQ after that. :mmm:
:rofl:

Go easy on him Chris.

At least he read the 1st post (more than many do in some threads!). Didn't get as far as the 6th though! :whistle:

Oddly, one of the 'sorts' that sprang to mind as the 'Committee Man' when I read the OP though! :rofl:
 
Yes, he was entitled to continue as has been stated plenty in previous posts - but as an aside to all this, what would be the position as regards the player having his card marked for the first hole? In the circumstances described of attempting to join in at the 2nd, wouldn't he have been on his own without a marker?

Which leds to a subsidiary question. Two players ready and waiting on the tee - the third not yet arrived by the allotted time. Given the third can still play (under penalty) if he arrives within 5 mins of the allotted time, should the other two not wait the full five mins before setting off? Is there any obligation that they do (or don't) wait?
 
Top