Ethan
Money List Winner
If there was a political slant to the whole exercise then surely the teachers' gradings would stand thereby enabling the Government to claim a success in their education policies.
I'm afraid that this is a situation from which no one is going to emerge unscathed.
Teachers will be accused of misleading pupils by inflating grades.
Pupils may find their future plans thrown into disarray.
Government will be slammed whichever method had been used in the absence of exams.
Heavy is the head, as Stormzy would say.
I agree it is a bad break for the Govt but a worse one for some pupils. There does appear to be some systematic issues within this algorithm, though. One is that more popular subjects are more likely to be adjusted because of the larger sample size and greater quantity of data available, whereas less popular niche subjects are less likely for the opposite reason. The latter category are more likely to be taken in private schools. And pupils who were at schools with few previous pupils going on to high grade subjects are penalised more because of the school's lack of track record. Again, private schools benefit.
There are only a finite number of places for a lot of subjects so simply saying that everybody can appeal or have the best of the various measures risks overfilling some courses, doesn't it? I assume that offers are made based on data from previous years and a degree of overselling, like the airlines, is needed. If the pass rate has sharply risen because there are additional ways to meet the grade, how can everyone's offer be honoured?
