D
Deleted member 1418
Guest
Personally I think the way the US Open has been set up in the past has been a bit ridiculous and a bit OTT, with very narrow fairways and deep, thick rough catching anything not on the fairway or on the green, making the next shot a hack out and a lottery where it will end up. And all this business about par being a score good enough to win - why?
I agree that the top players need to be challenged, but I want to also see the reason why they are playing at the level they are at, i.e. inventive shot making, either from on or off the fairway, risk being rewarded etc. Doesn't have to be a birdie-fest and the winning score at -20, but at least make it exciting. I think the only time the US Open has been that way has been the last couple. Hopefully that will be the same this year.
Hard, challenging, but a fair test - yes please.
I agree that the top players need to be challenged, but I want to also see the reason why they are playing at the level they are at, i.e. inventive shot making, either from on or off the fairway, risk being rewarded etc. Doesn't have to be a birdie-fest and the winning score at -20, but at least make it exciting. I think the only time the US Open has been that way has been the last couple. Hopefully that will be the same this year.
Hard, challenging, but a fair test - yes please.