Marshy77
Journeyman Pro
Perhaps the club should allow the fans to enter for £1, and be given a free lunch as well. That’s how golf clubs should run opens isn’t it?
Bury’s problems are their own.
Really don't understand the link.
Perhaps the club should allow the fans to enter for £1, and be given a free lunch as well. That’s how golf clubs should run opens isn’t it?
Bury’s problems are their own.
I will put my hands up first and say I have a passing interest in football rather than being a fan but I can see the poor situation that the game is in. Everyone wants that premiership money and so some clubs spend well beyond their means to move in that direction. When this does not work, the club are left on the brink of collapse. The lesson is never learned, however, as it is rare (I am not aware of any) for a club to be allowed to go under. The amount of time and the amount of chances that are given to a football club that are not given to a normal business seem obscene but it is football and so extra leeway is given.
Sadly this is happening in rugby and it is only a salary cap that is keeping some of this in check. How have the clubs reacted to this, they want to ringfence the premiership so as the big clubs are protected. If football ever ends up with a Premiership 2 so that all of the big names are in one or the other, I can see this happening in football as well.
What would I suggest. Salary caps in the lower leagues to prevent over spending with compulsory relegation clauses to bring wages in line with the salary cap in each given league. A levy on earnings for all clubs as a percentage of turnover to be applied to fund which will pay wages for a club in financial trouble. Such funds are to be repaid by the new owner if the club is bought. The name of any club and associated copyright passes to the FA should a club fold so as it can be applied for and issued to a new club in the lower leagues that represents that community, effectively allowing failed historic clubs to be reborn.
Just a few thoughts, probably none of which are realistic.
Don't see why not. Keep the amount reasonable or capped and it would be a drop in the ocean to the big clubs but would be a massive pr boost in helping lower leagues. It could even be tax deductible. A win all roundIncluding the premiership? I mean, if only they all gave 10% of all transfer fees, that would be a tidy sum.
Because a number of professions have a fund to help those in the same profession in need, why not football. It is to help people not the clubs. Does it not make you think when there is so much money in the premiership and emergency food banks being set up for Bolton staff members. Just think a bit of social care, looking after your own within a profession is a good thing.Why should other clubs pay a levy to bail someone else out🤔
Why should Premier league teams pay a percentage of transfer fees to smaller clubs.
Each club is their own individual business and should be run accordingly not relying on a monetary fund from other clubs to bail them out when needed. Why should City or Utd in this example as theyre the nearest clubs worry about what Bury does its not their problem the club can't run itself. What next do we tell tesco, sainsburys et al to lay a grocers money fund for the local failing Cost Cutter to stay afloat.
Football is not a game at board level it's business and clubs should run their own business accordingly. Some as a result my go under and yes that's sad but that's nobody else's fault.
Because a number of professions have a fund to help those in the same profession in need, why not football. It is to help people not the clubs. Does it not make you think when there is so much money in the premiership and emergency food banks being set up for Bolton staff members. Just think a bit of social care, looking after your own within a profession is a good thing.
No it doesn't at all, because those bail outs won't help long term, the mismanagement of the club with the funds they fail to generate does not automatically mean it will stop stewards, ticket sellers etc going hungry. It will work its way in to player wages and keeping that part alfoat for further mismanagement. The club would allow lesser jobs to go because they know supporter groups would volunteer to fill those other roles.Because a number of professions have a fund to help those in the same profession in need, why not football. It is to help people not the clubs. Does it not make you think when there is so much money in the premiership and emergency food banks being set up for Bolton staff members. Just think a bit of social care, looking after your own within a profession is a good thing.
No it won't, it really won't. Football as fans living in the past know it has already died its not the game of the working class man anymore at any level.And it's MILLIONS of pounds being swilled around in the top league. A few million passed down to keep a countries social weekend event alive would be money well spent! If the lower leagues were allowed to die, football, English football will die.
Including the premiership? I mean, if only they all gave 10% of all transfer fees, that would be a tidy sum.
So every time a club goes under, that's the Premier League's fault. Not even a little bit because they were poorly managed by owners. Even though just two clubs were mentioned and the other 70 clubs are alright despite largely not being helped by the Premier League. Alright then.
Nope not said that at all. Suggested a fund to support unpaid workers in the football profession paid for by all clubs not that it was the premier League's fault or that they should prop up the club or pay for it to keep going. Just a bit of social responsibility within the profession.So every time a club goes under, that's the Premier League's fault. Not even a little bit because they were poorly managed by owners. Even though just two clubs were mentioned and the other 70 clubs are alright despite largely not being helped by the Premier League. Alright then.
Nope not said that at all. Suggested a fund to support unpaid workers in the football profession paid for by all clubs not that it was the premier League's fault or that they should prop up the club or pay for it to keep going. Just a bit of social responsibility within the profession.
Exactly right, clubs would see it as a financial failsafe to include in potential budgeting instead of being financially responsible for themselves.The problem with things like this is that these clubs (I include my own in this) would think right we have x amount from the big boys coming to us so lets go for it, chuck a bit more money at it I'm sure this time it will work. And it won't and even more clubs will go out of business.
That social responsibility should be and is the that off the employing clubs not the responsibility of other clubs/businesses. I was recently made redundant from a business in the leisure sector, it wasn't the responsibility of other businesses in the same industry to ensure I was paid, football is no different. Harsh fact but its no different to any other employment. A back up fund would only as mentioned above give boards more free reign to gamble as they know there's a safety that they aren't even providing.Nope not said that at all. Suggested a fund to support unpaid workers in the football profession paid for by all clubs not that it was the premier League's fault or that they should prop up the club or pay for it to keep going. Just a bit of social responsibility within the profession.
Welcome to the world of business. Each business has responsibilities to itself and its employees not that of others and has no right to rely on handoutsMost of the other teams are in the same mess or being , just about, kept afloat by some monied loon. One dodgy financial decision and that's it.
I suppose so but the PFA offer similar help to players so some support for the regular staff would not seem unreasonableIsn't there a danger that if reckless chairmen know there's a safety net they'll be even more reckless?