Britains Got Talent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Penn & Teller would know... me I haven't a clue but I thought it was a great trick. It's really sad that a dog won AGAIN, is the public dog mad, does Britain really have talent or was the vote a big fiddle.
You should enter next year and we could have a Scotty win..:rofl:
 
Last edited:
And it wasn't just a random stunt dog that they used. It was one of her other dogs that had also been in the semi final performance. Mountain being made out of a molehill.
 
And it wasn't just a random stunt dog that they used. It was one of her other dogs that had also been in the semi final performance. Mountain being made out of a molehill.

And viewers were made fully aware that more than one dog used - and more than one dog paraded at end? So no slight of hand going on - that's OK then.
 
Dog A didn't walk a tightrope, but Dog B did. Does that make it any less impressive?
Yes, the Act was called Jules O'Dwyer and Matisse, if it was called Jules O'Dwyer and her dogs, then open and honest, Even the judges were unaware of the other Dog being used.
Fantastic animal trainer, just slightly deceitful imo.
 
Yes, the Act was called Jules O'Dwyer and Matisse, if it was called Jules O'Dwyer and her dogs, then open and honest, Even the judges were unaware of the other Dog being used.
Fantastic animal trainer, just slightly deceitful imo.


But it has got BGT another day of headlines.... cynical ... moi ???:rolleyes:
 
I wanted the magician to win and while the dog act was good, was it really the best act out there? I really wonder what goes through viewers minds when they phone up

I wouldn't even dream wasting my money voting on a TV comp/ show. Millions of people do vote, but does it really make any difference to the result.
 
Top