bluewolf
Money List Winner
The UK/EU FTA should be the easiest and simplest to agree
Careful, you're straying into Liam Fox territory there mate..
The UK/EU FTA should be the easiest and simplest to agree
I've posted on this before. Trade deals can be concluded very quickly, particularly if it's between just two nations; and if the collective will between the two is also there (the US/Australia agreement took just months to conclude rather than years).
It also depends on the nature of the agreement (i.e. whether it's purely trade in goods, or if it goes wider such as services as well).
The main issue with EU trade agreements is the process it takes to get formal agreement - approval by the Council, the European Parliament and all 28 Member States (in addition to getting the entire text of any agreement translated into each MS official language). Look at the recent CETA agreement - took the best part of 10 years since official launch of negotiations to agreement and being implemented (and I think it's only been partially implemented at the moment, but I could be wrong).
The UK/EU FTA should be the easiest and simplest to agree and implement seeing as we've been in a free trade agreement for 40 years!
As to agreements with the RoW once we leave the EU, there are a whole raft that have been more or less agreed and are awaiting formal sign off once we know what's happening with the EU situation.
I find that article weighted towards the worst case scenario. The UK would be free to set it's own tariffs and quotas so why would we penalise developing countries. The EU have been responsible for many problems in these countries due to their protectionist market, the UK as a member state have needed to apply whatever tariffs the EU set.While we worry about running out of Avacados or only having 6 different types of tomato’s to choose from on our empty supermarket shelf in case of no deal Brexit.
Have a look at this interesting report on impact on developing country because of Brexhit . Of course thing to remember it is a simulation, and every simulation (I have done few) will look at extremes. I am sure Believers will say that it has been sponsored by Germans and part of Project Fear.
But go ahead and have a read
https://apple.news/AOC3hRak-QMOGNS1MPMWVqg
I find that article weighted towards the worst case scenario. The UK would be free to set it's own tariffs and quotas so why would we penalise developing countries. The EU have been responsible for many problems in these countries due to their protectionist market, the UK as a member state have needed to apply whatever tariffs the EU set.
Do those restrictions only apply in a transition period or permanently?I've not looked at the 585 pages for weeks but in terms of tariffs for agricultural products the agreement stated that an independent body(hahahaha) would be set up to monitor agricultural policies and tariffs in the UK at the UK's expense. All policies and tariffs had to be agreed with the EU, and no tariff could be lower than that offered to the EU. Any policies, tariffs or practices applied without agreement with the EU could lead to fines. It read like both hands would be tied behind the UK's back.
Everyone appears to be fixating on the backstop but few seem to be looking at the deal as a whole. Some very fair, good stuff in it but there's some appalling clauses.
As Gina Miller said on QT last week, the UK is leaving the EU but its with an appalling deal.
Do those restrictions only apply in a transition period or permanently?
Nor could I, though it's possibly (hopefully!/surely!) in there somewhere.I couldn't find anything that said they only applied during the transitionary period but I must have missed something. Surely no one would sign a deal on those terms.
Interesting.
Corbyn speaking at an anti Lisbon Treaty meeting in 2009 in Ireland.
As an aside, I think it’s the first time I have ever seen him smile.
To me, this simply demonstrates how the EU (or the EEC as it was then) is/was NOT an issue divided on 'party' lines! It's an issue that SPANS both main parties - which is why May has difficulty actually getting anything through Parliament!I cannot understand why anyone would think the EU and Left are bedfellows, The EU has always been a creature of big business and the banks. It is not, and never has been, a ‘leftist’ or ‘liberal’ organisation. I recall the 1983 general election when the Labour party went to the country with the express policy of withdrawal from the European Economic Community whilst the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher supported continued membership!
A contributor to another website I read shared a link to a BBC ‘On This Day’ page entitled 1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC. The Labour government of Harold Wilson was so hopelessly split over membership of the EEC that the prime minister was forced to allow cabinet ministers to campaign on both sides of the issue in the 1975 referendum – just as David Cameron was forced to do in 2016. The Labour left was bitterly opposed to the EEC. The Industry Secretary Tony Benn was delighted when the unions and a special conference on EEC membership voted to leave, whilst his fellow left-winger, Employment Secretary Michael Foot, blamed high unemployment on what he said was the damage to Britain’s domestic market from European imports.
To me, this simply demonstrates how the EU (or the EEC as it was then) is/was NOT an issue divided on 'party' lines! It's an issue that SPANS both main parties - which is why May has difficulty actually getting anything through Parliament!
And why I believe this will go to the brink - or beyond - before either the EU blinks, perhaps extending the negotiation period, or UK simply leaves with 'No Deal'!
To me, the problem of the Irish border/backstop is a complication, but solve-able and not something that should stop the Leave process.
I agree 100%, anyone that thinks Brexit has anything to do with the colour of the political rosette you wear really has no grasp on the situation.
There are more than 2 colours in UK politics or does Scotland not count?
Did F&D actually mention a specific number?There are more than 2 colours in UK politics or does Scotland not count?I agree 100%, anyone that thinks Brexit has anything to do with the colour of the political rosette you wear really has no grasp on the situation.
There's also the colour of that chip on your shoulder.There are more than 2 colours in UK politics or does Scotland not count?
There are more than 2 colours in UK politics or does Scotland not count?