badgergm
Newbie
In essence you were given net birdie if you won a hole and net bogey if you lost a hole. Friendly to those who liked to keep their handicaps low.
In essence you were given net birdie if you won a hole and net bogey if you lost a hole. Friendly to those who liked to keep their handicaps low.
What do you infer from this? That the Starter doesn’t understand handicapping or he isn’t aware it’s a qualifier? Or he/Club think pace of play trumps handicap aspirationsSecond, our starter will always tell us to pick up once we cannot make par/net par.
A net double bogey putt? Why? Is a net double not the same as a net quad?You must continue for handicapping.
The post I was replying to said nothing about nett scores, and implied picking up having failed to make par, so not even holing out for (nett) bogey. Also, nett double-bogey adjustments for handicapping use Course Handicap, so this is what must be referenced when considering when to pick up or carry on playing - a nett double-bogey in the competition (95% Playing Handicap) may be a nett bogey for handicapping.A net double bogey putt? Why? Is a net double not the same as a net quad?
You’re right. I wrongly thought the poster was referring to a “nett” double bogey. And I know when a nett double isn’t a nett double in comps. I try explaining it to playing partners when they go to pick up on “that” hole. They just look bemused. Same bemused look as when I explain why their PH is different to what the board says it should be.The post I was replying to said nothing about nett scores, and implied picking up having failed to make par, so not even holing out for (nett) bogey. Also, nett double-bogey adjustments for handicapping use Course Handicap, so this is what must be referenced when considering when to pick up or carry on playing - a nett double-bogey in the competition (95% Playing Handicap) may be a nett bogey for handicapping.
Surely you know I meant for handicap purposes i.e. 0 Stableford points.Double = x2; double-bogey = 2 over par.
Quad = x4; quad-bogey = 4 over par.
What do you infer from this? That the Starter doesn’t understand handicapping or he isn’t aware it’s a qualifier? Or he/Club think pace of play trumps handicap aspirations
Going home because your starter is ignorant of the applicable rules seems like a bit of an extreme reaction.There is always a pressure placed on us by our starters to maintain a pace of play, and the one who started our most recent bogey comp, referred to above, simply didn’t understand the implications on handicaps of telling members to pick up if they couldn’t return par/net par on a hole. I know this because I asked him the direct question, and told him if the committee was running the comp as a qualifier then I would be putting out as I would in a stableford. He told me that I must pick up. I turned round, put my kit back in my car and went home.
I have only recently had an exchange of emails with our comp chairman on this very subject and he confirmed that, whilst we will be continuing to run bogey comps as qualifiers, there will be a very explicit instruction to all participants regarding the need to putt out as they would in a stableford. Given this is a conversation I have with them every year, I’m not holding my breath.
Going home because your starter is ignorant of the applicable rules seems like a bit of an extreme reaction.
All Starters should be given a script and be told not to divert from it. If they are asked a question that is not in the script and cannot give the definitive answer, they should ask whoever is running the show..Not really. It’s not uncommon for our starters to give conflicting advice to different groups on the same day, so if I don’t think there’s a level playing field before I even go out then I’m minded not to bother, especially if the format is one I don’t especially enjoy to begin with.
All our starters are committee volunteers, and some are better than others. Some stick to a pre-prepared script, others ad lib their way through it. It’s the latter who cause most of the problems.
All Starters should be given a script and be told not to divert from it. If they are asked a question that is not in the script and cannot give the definitive answer, they should ask whoever is running the show..
Yes, in an ideal world.
Ideal worlds come from competent committees.