Me neither, especially as now there is a debate as to whether the stunt has actually increased its value.Don't get it really, if you're happy to destroy something valued at over a million quid for a stunt, you've clearly got too much money, self indulgent nonsense and very disrespectful to millions living in poverty. Banksy could've sold it to people stupid enough to buy it and put the money to the Indonesian relief fund.
Me neither, especially as now there is a debate as to whether the stunt has actually increased its value.
Don't get it really, if you're happy to destroy something valued at over a million quid for a stunt, you've clearly got too much money, self indulgent nonsense and very disrespectful to millions living in poverty. Banksy could've sold it to people stupid enough to buy it and put the money to the Indonesian relief fund.
Banksy’s identity is well known. He was in Massive Attack.
That’s more a rumour after Goldie said it was him but nothing has been confirmed along with a few other names in the melting pot
So right now his identity is still unknown
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news...e-ten-most-plausible-theories-699059/amp-pageIt really isn’t. It is him. They don’t officially confirm it so it keeps his lot high but it is him.