Another rule question. (balls touching each other)

V

vkurup

Guest
During the round last week, two guys from my group hit their second shot to just off the fairway. When they reached the scene, they realised that both balls were sitting pretty snug and kissing each other. There was no one one could take his third shot without touching/hitting/moving the other ball.


Since it was a social game, one of them picked his up while the other made his stroke. He then replaced it to its original position and took his third.


What should have been the correct way to deal with such a situation
 

bobmac

Major Champion
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
28,111
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Yeup.
Mark where it is, lift it, (you can't clean it) and replace it when it's your turn.

Finished, done and dusted, sorted, answered.
Cue rules experts
 
Last edited:

Lump

Tour Winner
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,412
Location
Selby, North Yorkshire
Visit site
Is there not something in there too about recreating the lie too?
If the person with the ball furtherst away takes a bleeding great divot, the second player would get a much better lie.
 
V

vkurup

Guest
Is there not something in there too about recreating the lie too?
If the person with the ball furtherst away takes a bleeding great divot, the second player would get a much better lie.
At our skill level, it did not matter... but I think it is a valid point..
 

garyinderry

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
13,244
Visit site
there is no way of recreating the lie if the origional balls were in a divot. then player 1 hits his shot and takes a bigger divot with his wedge. how can player 2 replace his ball in the same origional position?
 

bobmac

Major Champion
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
28,111
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
there is no way of recreating the lie if the origional balls were in a divot. then player 1 hits his shot and takes a bigger divot with his wedge. how can player 2 replace his ball in the same origional position?

If you cant re-create the lie then common sense prevails...replace the second ball on the nearest similar lie to the original lie, not nearer the hole
 

DaveM

Tour Winner
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
2,870
Location
Manchester
Visit site
there is no way of recreating the lie if the original balls were in a divot. then player 1 hits his shot and takes a bigger divot with his wedge. how can player 2 replace his ball in the same original position?

Not sure without checking. But I think it says. "Or as near as possible", You could also go and replace the divot and reconstruct the original lie?
 

garyinderry

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
13,244
Visit site
Not sure without checking. But I think it says. "Or as near as possible", You could also go and replace the divot and reconstruct the original lie?


two balls already resting in a divot, then the first player takes a mahoosive divot with his wedge and leaves it virtualy impossible to recreate the first lie.


its a tricky one but im sure it doesnt come up all that often. ill not lose sleep over it. lol
 

duncan mackie

Money List Winner
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
11,136
Visit site
two balls already resting in a divot, then the first player takes a mahoosive divot with his wedge and leaves it virtualy impossible to recreate the first lie.


its a tricky one but im sure it doesnt come up all that often. ill not lose sleep over it. lol

doesn't even need common sense - the rules are very clear that if the lie is altered " the ball must be placed in the nearest lie most similar to the original lie that is not more than one club-length from the original lie, not nearer the hole and not in a hazard " if the ball was origionally in a water hazard then as above but in the hazard, in a bunker you recreate the lie as best you can.

in the particula example here you would look for a similar divot, or similar lie - the player playing second may well get lucky!
 
Top