spongebob59
Journeyman Pro
Sounds an absolute nightmare, hope all the foreign nationals get out safely.
Still can't get it round my head how 1000's of trained troops with billions of pounds of kit just rolled over.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-asia-58219963
Well looks like that’s it then - Taliban have pretty taken back control of the country
Blimey to think it wasn’t that long ago I was in both Kandahar and at Bagram Airport - both now being run by Taliban
Still can't get it round my head how 1000's of trained troops with billions of pounds of kit just rolled over.
I can see why your saying that but I don't see the Taliban with any air support.Because at the end of the day they are still Afghans and they don’t have the key item - air support - many Afghans “volunteered” for the Army to give themselves a job and regular pay. As soon as they no longer had the support of the foreign forces then the Taliban were going to re take control - the shock is how quickly and easily it’s happening
I can see why your saying that but I don't see the Taliban with any air support.
I see your point but air support can create some horrendous civilian and structural deviation.The air support kept them at bay - the Taliban have been fighting on that terrain for hundreds of years , air supremacy kept them a lot more pinned in , now without that they can just overpower and it seems that towns aren’t falling without too much force being used tbh. The country won’t change - and people need to stop trying too
I see your point but air support can create some horrendous civilian and structural deviation.
What I said. These battles tend to be in cities, you must have seen the deviation created in Syria etc.Eh ?
What I said. These battles tend to be in cities, you must have seen the deviation created in Syria etc.
Do you mean devastation rather than deviation?What I said. These battles tend to be in cities, you must have seen the deviation created in Syria etc.
Yes, it was a typo/autocorrect.Do you mean devastation rather than deviation?
That would make more sense to me
I meant devastation, my auto correct altered it. My point is that if you use air support to troops on the ground fighting in cities then you will get the inevitable civilian casualties and property damage. Maybe you can explain how you can support the Afghan army with airpower in built up areas without the associated destruction.I’m not sure what it has to do with the point I made ? - Syria and the air strikes there are hugely different to way the air space has been used in Afghanistan-
I meant devastation, my auto correct altered it. My point is that if you use air support to troops on the ground fighting in cities then you will get the inevitable civilian casualties and property damage. May be you can explain how you can support the Afghan army with airpower in built up areas without the associated destruction.
Precision weapon systems are now so accurate that in most cases (not all) civilian casualties are rare due to the procedures that British forces try to adhere too whether it’s AC, Helo or Predator drones.I meant devastation, my auto correct altered it. My point is that if you use air support to troops on the ground fighting in cities then you will get the inevitable civilian casualties and property damage. Maybe you can explain how you can support the Afghan army with airpower in built up areas without the associated destruction.