D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Lived in scotland for plenty of years to see the Scottish bias within the media ?How do you know if you have never had to suffer it.
Lived in scotland for plenty of years to see the Scottish bias within the media ?How do you know if you have never had to suffer it.
Caught a bit of a discussion on 5live tonight about the match, it made me realise that I had been watching the wrong game ........ in the one I saw Ireland won !
Lived in scotland for plenty of years to see the Scottish bias within the media ?
Not a Scottish Express or Mail reader then.
I would love to know which TV stations in Scotland have a Scottish bias, perhaps you could name them.
When the folk in England are watching Hamilton Accies play Cove Rangers in the Scottish Cup on prime time English BBC 1 or 2 perhaps we could have a conversation.... because I find having diddy English teams playing Cup games on prime time Scottish TV very very strange.
Not sure what “diddy” English team are on Prime Time Scottish Tv but you are more than welcome to “turn over” - if it’s not to your liking.
If I want to watch the Scottish Cup then I can if I wish
But once again you are just taking the thread to some anti English angle and bring football into it
No, the thread is about the Six Nations. You’re the one moaning about watching English club rugby.Diddy English teams are 6th tier clubs playing in the English Cup televised matches.
As I said imagine English viewers having to make 'the choice to turn over' from watching Brechin City v Cowdenbeath on prime time BBC1 or 2.
I think Brechin and Clach are both 5th tier Scottish Leagues.
The thread was talking about equality of TV sports production on British TV.
I was giving you a glaring example of how skewed it is. [Two now.]
A good Scitland victory over a spicy Italian side. Still plenty errors in our game and fear a tanking in Dublin if we play like that however that is a game we would have lost 6 years ago
Also best performance this tournament by Italy imo. Not sure whether how much, if any, was due to 'the opposition', but an entertaining game. Still a bit 'league-ish' for me to love, but that is what the 'modern' game has evolved into. It's also why scrums must continue, even if uncontested, as that 'removes' 8 guys from each side which allows gaps in the back-line to be probed.A good Scitland victory over a spicy Italian side. Still plenty errors in our game and fear a tanking in Dublin if we play like that however that is a game we would have lost 6 years ago
Yeah, we watched in the Twickenham fan zone. It was a great watch.Your game was a great watch. Was going to switch off and listen to the Tigers at half time but ended up watching the full 80 minutes
Either uncontested or only contested as the ball is fed in. It's getting pathetic how often the scrum collapses at the set stage now. If it has to be contested then maybe reduce it to five so play can be more attacking.Also best performance this tournament by Italy imo. Not sure whether how much, if any, was due to 'the opposition', but an entertaining game. Still a bit 'league-ish' for me to love, but that is what the 'modern' game has evolved into. It's also why scrums must continue, even if uncontested, as that 'removes' 8 guys from each side which allows gaps in the back-line to be probed.
Just get the ball fed in straight and get the hookers hooking.Either uncontested or only contested as the ball is fed in. It's getting pathetic how often the scrum collapses at the set stage now. If it has to be contested then maybe reduce it to five so play can be more attacking.
You missed/failed to absorb my assertion that having 8-man scrums promotes more attacking play - with backs spread widely across the field capable of probing the greater gaps betwen players. A 5 man scrum would be little difference from a maul, with 3 more players squeezing the space for attacks and play likely to become even more 'league-like' than the high-paced, flowing attacks I prefer.Either uncontested or only contested as the ball is fed in. It's getting pathetic how often the scrum collapses at the set stage now. If it has to be contested then maybe reduce it to five so play can be more attacking.
I disagree, Rugby Union has become too slow and lacking flair. The game needs changing.You missed/failed to absorb my assertion that having 8-man scrums promotes more attacking play - with backs spread widely across the field capable of probing the greater gaps betwen players. A 5 man scrum would be little difference from a maul, with 3 more players squeezing the space for attacks and play likely to become even more 'league-like' than the high-paced, flowing attacks I prefer.
A properly hooked ball is the fastest ball there is in the game. Ball goes in, the hooker hooks the ball straight to the number 8s feet and the ball is available in about a second. Then it's upto the scrum half/8 to get it out to the backs as they see fit.I disagree, Rugby Union has become too slow and lacking flair. The game needs changing.
The ball is never put in straight, the scrum collapses or turns creating a fail more often than a clean ball back. It's a time waste and imo needs changing.A properly hooked ball is the fastest ball there is in the game. Ball goes in, the hooker hooks the ball straight to the number 8s feet and the ball is available in about a second. Then it's upto the scrum half/8 to get it out to the backs as they see fit.
It's a totally reasonable way of restarting the game after a breakdown, giving the non-offending/forward moving side an/the advantage.The ball is never put in straight, the scrum collapses or turns creating a fail more often than a clean ball back. It's a time waste and imo needs changing.