duncan mackie
Money List Winner
If it's inadvertent it's not cheating...Personally, I think it tells us that inadvertent cheating is getting more common.![]()
If it's inadvertent it's not cheating...Personally, I think it tells us that inadvertent cheating is getting more common.![]()
Without wanting to reignite this for another day, my point was simply that it can't be considered a rule break if not a single person acknowledges or knows that a rule has been broken can it? Or maybe it is, but it is completely irrelevant and meaningless. That's why I likened it to the tree falling in a forest and does it make a sound - because sound has to be received by an ear to be interpreted as sound. It's the same thing.We are in the physical world of people on golf courses not a metaphysics tutorial so spare us the trees falling in a forest. The bolded statement is just plain wrong. A rule break occurs because something has happened which is against the rules. It may go unnoticed by the player, by other players, by spectators etc but the event has occurred.
I am sorry that my efforts to explain the rules in this regard have been unsuccessful and sorrier still that they have been met in part by mockery and in one instance by insult. That's not common in this forum and i hope it will stay uncommon.
It still makes a sound .Without wanting to reignite this for another day, my point was simply that it can't be considered a rule break if not a single person acknowledges or knows that a rule has been broken can it? Or maybe it is, but it is completely irrelevant and meaningless. That's why I likened it to the tree falling in a forest and does it make a sound - because sound has to be received by an ear to be interpreted as sound. It's the same thing.
It makes soundwaves.It still makes a sound .
I reckon the birds heard it.It makes soundwaves.
"In human physiology and psychology, sound is the reception of such waves and their perception by the brain."
Is this timer actually part of the trolley facilities (rather than something you've added)?me either, but i do have a 5 min timer on my Trolley, which is 5min then flashes when the 5 is up...obv the flashing isn't much use but if we are in a match i try and use it
I would suggest this additional feature on the trolley was designed a few years back and relevant to when five minutes was allowed to search and so was fit for that purpose. The rule changes have usurped that. The biggest problem I see with that and any updated versions thereof is that a trolley isn't always near the search area and so spotting a flashing light isn't viable. An audible alarm would be goodIs this timer actually part of the trolley facilities (rather than something you've added)?
Because if it is, then here's another example of something that's been designed without thought for its purpose. Of course you're not going to be looking at it while searching! It should obviously have an audible alarm. It's not rocket science.
Just to clarify - I wasn't talking about the 5min issue - just the lack of an audible alarm.I would suggest this additional feature on the trolley was designed a few years back and relevant to when five minutes was allowed to search and so was fit for that purpose. The rule changes have usurped that. The biggest problem I see with that and any updated versions thereof is that a trolley isn't always near the search area and so spotting a flashing light isn't viable. An audible alarm would be good
yes its a Motocaddy from about 5 years ago. i'd imagine its doesn't have an audible alarm deliberately, you wouldn;t want alarms going off across the course while people are playing. not much use now they changed the search time.Is this timer actually part of the trolley facilities (rather than something you've added)?
Because if it is, then here's another example of something that's been designed without thought for its purpose. Of course you're not going to be looking at it while searching! It should obviously have an audible alarm. It's not rocket science.
Without wanting to reignite this for another day, my point was simply that it can't be considered a rule break if not a single person acknowledges or knows that a rule has been broken can it? Or maybe it is, but it is completely irrelevant and meaningless. That's why I likened it to the tree falling in a forest and does it make a sound - because sound has to be received by an ear to be interpreted as sound. It's the same thing.
What if the 4 ball enter the comp know the rules but nobody wears a watch, carries a stop watch but has to find a ball would it be assumed they're all cheatingSimple question - if a 4 ball enter a competition and not one of the players knew any of the rules of golf, would that in any way be considered cheating ?
What if the 4 ball enter the comp know the rules but nobody wears a watch, carries a stop watch but has to find a ball would it be assumed they're all cheating
Really many people carry egg timers as essential golfing kit.. Plus that's just dodging the question. If someone doesn't have a timing device would you assume they're all cheatingThey may be carrying an egg timer
Really many people carry egg timers as essential golfing kit.. Plus that's just dodging the question. If someone doesn't have a timing device would you assume they're all cheating
Seriously if a group are playing and don't have a means of timing their search are you saying they're all likely to be cheating. Like others I've never once played a round where a timer of any description has been used when searching for a ball. This includes as a junior playing County events never once was a timer used then, club events now or in matches elsewhere. Never once have I thought to accuse someone of cheating, time gets called at an estimate and people move on.
I've a knockout match this evening if I need help my opponent search I will but I wouldn't think to time him. I don't wear a watch, nor do I have a stop watch, egg timer. My GPS doesn't display the time when in DMD mode and I leave my phone off in my bag out of courtesy to my PP.
I'm not questioning the rule, I agree with it and think it's better than the 5minute rule was.What I think is that the rules are specific and 3 minutes search time is a precise limit. Players, knowing this, should put themselves in a position that they can comply with the rule which, after all, is one of the rules that every golfer should (and probably does) know. Whether not being able, willing or prepared to time a search properly it is still a matter of fact as to when the time limit has been exceeded and failure to play precisely to that rule is a penalty.
If you dont take a timing device on the course but never ever spend more than 3 minutes searching for your ball then you clearly are not cheating.
Cheating is willfully breaking the rules, so if you don't know them you can't really be cheating. That's not really related to what we're talking about though.Simple question - if a 4 ball enter a competition and not one of the players knew any of the rules of golf, would that in any way be considered cheating ?
Bird won't hear it..I reckon the birds heard it.
Count to 180?What if the 4 ball enter the comp know the rules but nobody wears a watch, carries a stop watch but has to find a ball would it be assumed they're all cheating