Orikoru
Tour Winner
If a tree falls in a forest and nobody hears it, does it make a sound? For a rule break to occur that has to be some acknowledgement that a rule has been broken, surely you understand that? So if the player believes he found the ball inside 3 minutes, and his FCs believe that to be the case also, all parties are satisfied, and everyone gets on with their lives. To bring an extra level of clinicality to it as you suggest just seems awfully unnecessary to me.Unfortunately, I don't have knowledge of what "most people" do or don't do, what 90% of golfers do or don't do, but if you give me references to whatever statistical studies you have access to that would allow me to share that understanding I'd be grateful.
When you say, "You've not broken a rule if nobody can ascertain that you went over 3 minutes have you?", that lies at the heart of your misunderstanding. To repeat, the passage of 3 minutes is a matter of fact whether anyone has timed it or not. If my untimed search does not turn up my ball within 3 minutes of starting it, it is a matter of fact that my ball is lost. Whether anyone knows that 3 minutes have elapsed, knows that my ball is therefore lost, it is in terms of the rules, lost and if I then find it and play it, I have played a wrong ball, broken a rule no matter that it was done innocently. In the interests of the entire field in a competition it would really be better that everyone times their searches so that no-one inadvertently exceeds the time limit and plays a wrong ball without knowing it, thereby gaining an unfair advantage over other players. That's it really: it's in the interests of fairness to all players to know , not guess or estimate when your search time is up.
