2019 Cricket

Ok quickie for you cricket gurus, especially Fundy and Mudball.

what was unique about the number of runs Alex Stewart scored in tests ? No googling chaps.
 
Not quite. Just read a book by Marcus Bergman who gave all sorts of irrelevant info. Will give you one more try and tell you tomorrow.
unless somebody beats you with the answer
 
Not quite. Just read a book by Marcus Bergman who gave all sorts of irrelevant info. Will give you one more try and tell you tomorrow.
unless somebody beats you with the answer

only other one i remember that gets quoted about Stewart is he lost more tests than any other player (not sure if thats still true). my dads fav player, he'd prob know the answer in a split second lol
 
Just had a look at the scorecard for Aus v Pak. Pakistan must've been feeling pretty good when they had the Aussies at 8-1. Probably less so when the second wicket fell to make it 369-2. Aus 589-3 declared (Warner 335*, Labuschagne 162). Pakistan in response 3-1.
 
Hard to see anything but a draw with little play after lunch tomorrow expected

Root happily having a decent net and not worrying too much about pressing the scoring rate when a results needed (almost the complete opposite of how we normally bat lol)
 
Hard to see anything but a draw with little play after lunch tomorrow expected

Root happily having a decent net and not worrying too much about pressing the scoring rate when a results needed (almost the complete opposite of how we normally bat lol)

Can understand it.. given our propensity to collapse, Root wants to ensure that at least one game is draw.. if they press for it and we collapse and lose then he will be up the creek. That’s the negative mindset wher we are. Flat is the new up - Draw is a win
 
Can understand it.. given our propensity to collapse, Root wants to ensure that at least one game is draw.. if they press for it and we collapse and lose then he will be up the creek. That’s the negative mindset wher we are. Flat is the new up - Draw is a win

why didnt we bat like that at 0-0 in the first test then?
 
why didnt we bat like that at 0-0 in the first test then?

Exactly. I think they tried, but no one pushed on. NZ are great at home but these wickets have been dead. Im not sure if they were prepared like this on purpose but basically the wickets have negated Archer and Broad.

On the plus side, Stokes, Pope and Butler looks a decent 5,6,7. Ali will come back into the side and slot in at 8 when a spinner is needed.

Burns, Denly, Bairstowe, Root, Stokes, Pope, Butler, Ali, Curran, Archer, Broad is a decent side.
 
Good knock from Root. Shame the last few wickets went quickly but when I saw we'd got a couple of early wickets I was getting more confident we could nick a win. Looks like we'll have to really get amongst them first thing and if we do I can see us having to get 230-250 in a session and a bit
 
Exactly. I think they tried, but no one pushed on. NZ are great at home but these wickets have been dead. Im not sure if they were prepared like this on purpose but basically the wickets have negated Archer and Broad.

On the plus side, Stokes, Pope and Butler looks a decent 5,6,7. Ali will come back into the side and slot in at 8 when a spinner is needed.

Burns, Denly, Bairstowe, Root, Stokes, Pope, Butler, Ali, Curran, Archer, Broad is a decent side.


Didnt look much like it to me as they got out to an assortment of slashes to wide balls in the first test! Just conpletely back to front the way theyre approached batting in the 2 tests and gifted NZ the series in the process


what have Bairstow and Ali done to get back in? no Anderson when fit?
 
Top