D
Deleted member 18588
Guest
if they didnt take that into account the targets set would be an awful lot lower, it has a bad perception but its rarely far off being fair these days, works pretty well in most scenarios (certainly better than its predecessor!)
If we look at the comparative run rates of T20 and the 50 overs game it does seem that 190 for 9 is easier to get in say 25 overs than 325 for 9 in 50.
The algorithm used does not appear to fully factor the depth of batting these days.