Who is going to win the premiership title.

And your city game, hopefully you'll have same linesman as yesterday. Your fast forward line will tear their high defence to pieces lol

But there forward line is pretty special

Hopefully we will target Demichellies
 
Toure a doubt. Augers first game back maybe. As Rogers said few weeks back. Even if you were bottom he'd consider you favourites against anyone at Anfield.

Still leaves Silva , Nasri , Navas , Dzeko , Negredo to worry about

Who knows
 
As far as I'm concerned the situation for LFC hasn't changed one bit. We need to win the last 5 games we have to take the title. It's as simple as that, take it one game at a time and win each one.
 
I have said for weeks, guaranteed champions league is a great step forward, the fact we have a chance to win it is dreamland. Will we? Who knows, on paper City are miles ahead with regards ability and strength in depth but that doesnt always win things.

In Rodgers we trust :)

YNWA
 
Probably best that the ref gave the 2nd pen,or it would av been poor old us yet again.

I thought it was a pen , keeper got some of the ball but his hand went over it and took his legs .. if it was out the field and the foot went over the ball , it would be a foul ..

ANYONE ELSE see it that way ???/
 
Arsenal won't :rofl:

man city, hmm I don't want them to but they are looking good for it unless they stumble on the run in.
liverpool would be nice they have played some good football, definitely like to see them in Europe, I like the fact they use a few English players
chelsea , well I don't think so, next season when their midfield has settled in and perhaps he gets a striker who does finish and is young.
 
I thought it was a pen , keeper got some of the ball but his hand went over it and took his legs .. if it was out the field and the foot went over the ball , it would be a foul ..

ANYONE ELSE see it that way ???/

Rodgers did and also showed them it in a replay during the post match interview
 
I thought it was a pen , keeper got some of the ball but his hand went over it and took his legs .. if it was out the field and the foot went over the ball , it would be a foul ..

ANYONE ELSE see it that way ???/

Not for me I'm afraid. But the ref made 2 big mistakes in the game so it didn't affect the outcome.
Thing is if the 2nd incident didn't happen then Liverpool would possibly have dropped 2pts that could cost them the title.
 
Norwich have sacked their manager ! 5 games to go ! Madness or looking for the new manager boost ?
 
I thought it was a pen , keeper got some of the ball but his hand went over it and took his legs .. if it was out the field and the foot went over the ball , it would be a foul ..

ANYONE ELSE see it that way ???/

i can can see your point. But generally if a keeper gets the ball and clears the player it's not a foul. Don't think it was a pen personally. Keepers touch was enough to redirect ball and remove immediate danger, but I don't think it was as big an error as the west ham goal.
 
I thought it was a pen , keeper got some of the ball but his hand went over it and took his legs .. if it was out the field and the foot went over the ball , it would be a foul ..

ANYONE ELSE see it that way ???/


I'm with you on this although i do feel it was a soft pen.

The goalie comes over the top of the ball as oppose to sweeping it away and his follow through catches the player. If this is outside the box by a outfield player using his feet its a foul/freekick all day long.

If the 2 decisions were not given then we may of won 1-0 but we'll never know that now. The funny thing is with West Ham's goal the liner had his flag up pretty much right away only for the ref to over rule it.

Massive game next week against City and lets hope we're not talking about referee's decisions deciding the result.
 
i can can see your point. But generally if a keeper gets the ball and clears the player it's not a foul. Don't think it was a pen personally. Keepers touch was enough to redirect ball and remove immediate danger, but I don't think it was as big an error as the west ham goal.

If the ball went in a different direction then yeah i'd agree but the fact it didn't it was a pen, usually a goalie gets a hand to the ball and the ball goes a different direction.
 
If the ball went in a different direction then yeah i'd agree but the fact it didn't it was a pen, usually a goalie gets a hand to the ball and the ball goes a different direction.

I don't think the direction matters. If pens are given when keepers actually touch the ball then we're gonna see a whole lot more. Al the pundits called it as an error and I'd side with them. The amount of contact by the keeper on the ball is irrelevant. As is the second contact on flanagan (who btw was on his way down). Once the keeper touches the ball he is deemed to have taken control of it. So if he touches it and the contacts your player it isn't a foul as he has won the ball.
 
Top