USER1999
Grand Slam Winner
But there is also the question, why?
Ok, so someone can hit a 300 yard drive, which is self confessed, directionally challenged. So in reality, they can't hit a 300 yard drive, as they have no control what so ever (which would also play merry heck with the term 'average') over the direction. Surely rather than the macho I hit 100 yard drives, they would be better off hitting a controlled 265, and getting on the fairway more often. This would lead to the lower scores that reduce the handicap.
The pro's who hit these distances (300+) are still hitting at 90%, and I am sure many pros who don't hit this long could, if their livelihoods didn't depend on a consistency that others don't seem to value.
Ok, so someone can hit a 300 yard drive, which is self confessed, directionally challenged. So in reality, they can't hit a 300 yard drive, as they have no control what so ever (which would also play merry heck with the term 'average') over the direction. Surely rather than the macho I hit 100 yard drives, they would be better off hitting a controlled 265, and getting on the fairway more often. This would lead to the lower scores that reduce the handicap.
The pro's who hit these distances (300+) are still hitting at 90%, and I am sure many pros who don't hit this long could, if their livelihoods didn't depend on a consistency that others don't seem to value.