God I would love it if he came back now!!!
Can't believe anyone would want to see Tiger DQ from the Masters it would be boring without him and golf would be half the sport it is now!!!
hence why I bow to the foums expertise in these matters.
I still think asking for him to be dq'd is a tad pants though. Anyway 2 shot penalty it wrongly is so lets move on
Go home Tiger :thup:
You thought there were a lot of Tiger Haters.
If he doesn't withdraw you'll see a whole lot more.....
He wants to be the Greatest?
Here's his chance to get further up the ladder by withdrawing
The way I'm reading this new ruling is as follows...
New rules state that 'if the Committee is satisfied that the competitor could not reasonably have known or discovered the facts resulting in his breach of the Rules, it would be justified under Rule 33-7 in waiving the disqualification penalty prescribed by Rule 6-6d.'
Daily Mail
Now if Tiger didn't deliberately break the rule then he hasn't done anything wrong has he?
Can someone explain where I'm getting mixed up?
If he had any 'class' he would withdraw....
Wayne Grady was just asked what he thought of the 2 shot penalty.
His reply......
Rubbish
Best post so far.......Tiger once again showing us what he is made of.
Can I just remind everyone on here that MikeH asked that we avoid using terms like "haters"
do we not see this in most sports now? I am not excusing it but, it seems that money via bums on seats/tv audiences is more important.
It's funny though if you are all saying he has still broke the rules then your admitting the great man is bigger than the Masters and possibly the sport itself - another win for Tiger then :thup: