bozza
Journeyman Pro
Saw it , no problem in my eyes.
Well there is a problem if he doesn't replace his ball is the same place as when he placed his marker nowhere near it.
Saw it , no problem in my eyes.
Well there is a problem if he doesn't replace his ball is the same place as when he placed his marker nowhere near it.
gotta love these threads, only because its tiger, laughable
Not Dyson or Sergio then. The OP has a fair point. When things are open to question they get questioned.
To the best of my memory that wasn't shown so mere speculation ..........Well there is a problem if he doesn't replace his ball is the same place as when he placed his marker nowhere near it.
To the best of my memory that wasn't shown so mere speculation ..........
To the best of my memory that wasn't shown so mere speculation ..........
But how does he know where the correct place is if he places his marker a 1" away from where his ball was?
But why do it?
Would you throw your marker down behind your ball at least a 1" away then try guess where your ball actually was when you marked it?
Wasn't it one of the Saltman brothers that got a ban for something similar?
Yes they did it more than once but who's to say Tiger hasn't but his playing partners won't speak up due it being Tiger.
Whilst not normally the first to defend Tiger, have to defend the accusation of cheating in this case. Firstly we do not know where he replaced the ball. Secondly how is placing the marker an inch behind his ball give him any sort of advantage, if he replaces in the normal manner then his ball will be further from the hole than it ought to be. Sloppy yes, against the rules maybe, cheating defiantly not.
I think that's what they call conjecture. Yes it looks like an odd thing to do but it's a huge leap from "odd" to "cheat"
Like I said earlier the thread title was tongue in cheek,.
Simon Dysons alleged tapping down of a spike mark looked "odd" and he got branded a cheat.
You should probably rethink your thread titles then, "cheat" isn't something you accuse someone of even jokingly.
As for Dyson, he wasn't branded a cheat by all of us.
But enough to make it stick
You should probably rethink your thread titles then, "cheat" isn't something you accuse someone of even jokingly.
As for Dyson, he wasn't branded a cheat by all of us.
Sadly, you maybe right