medwayjon
Tour Winner
Im a spurs fan, as some will know, and I want success. The problem here is, success in the eyes of the fans is very different to that of the owners.
In terms of the ownership, success here is measured by bank-statements and balance-sheets. We are owned by an investment company, and a successful one at that.
For 2/3 years, we have been on the cusp of achieving something. However we refused to buy the world-class striker who would have fired us to that glory. For the simple reason, we do not spend money like that.
The way our club is run, it is better to finish 10th and make £5m than win the league and make a million, sadly, that will always be the way when ENIC own the club.
Therefore, the managers position really is a poisoned-chalice and as such, there is no reason why a top-class manager would take it unless the salary was so rich he couldnt say no.
Spurs always sell their best players. Carrick, Berbatov, Modric, Bale. All sold, and the common denominator here is that Daniel Levy said of each player, "He is not for sale, at any price"
The season tickets are renewed and then all of a sudden the players are sold, with the excuse of "you cant keep a player who doesnt want to stay, his head will not be right"
Well, look at Suarez, he wanted out, and yup, he really isnt playing well is he!
Any manager here must accept that instead of building for success, he will have to sell his best players.
People say "Tottenham spent £100m this summer" well that is far from the truth. Our net spend was infact zero, we made money.
We signed players like Lamela, Eriksen, Chadli, Capoe & Eriksen, none of whom are proven top-class players in a scatter-gun approach to hopefully keep the happy-clappers clapping, and ultimately that they would become the next £50m players.
We have sold a match-winner, a game-changer, a world-class player and replaced him with a series of punts.
If we had held our resolve, kept Bale and invested £50m in a striker and LB who knows where we would be.
In terms of the ownership, success here is measured by bank-statements and balance-sheets. We are owned by an investment company, and a successful one at that.
For 2/3 years, we have been on the cusp of achieving something. However we refused to buy the world-class striker who would have fired us to that glory. For the simple reason, we do not spend money like that.
The way our club is run, it is better to finish 10th and make £5m than win the league and make a million, sadly, that will always be the way when ENIC own the club.
Therefore, the managers position really is a poisoned-chalice and as such, there is no reason why a top-class manager would take it unless the salary was so rich he couldnt say no.
Spurs always sell their best players. Carrick, Berbatov, Modric, Bale. All sold, and the common denominator here is that Daniel Levy said of each player, "He is not for sale, at any price"
The season tickets are renewed and then all of a sudden the players are sold, with the excuse of "you cant keep a player who doesnt want to stay, his head will not be right"
Well, look at Suarez, he wanted out, and yup, he really isnt playing well is he!
Any manager here must accept that instead of building for success, he will have to sell his best players.
People say "Tottenham spent £100m this summer" well that is far from the truth. Our net spend was infact zero, we made money.
We signed players like Lamela, Eriksen, Chadli, Capoe & Eriksen, none of whom are proven top-class players in a scatter-gun approach to hopefully keep the happy-clappers clapping, and ultimately that they would become the next £50m players.
We have sold a match-winner, a game-changer, a world-class player and replaced him with a series of punts.
If we had held our resolve, kept Bale and invested £50m in a striker and LB who knows where we would be.