He's fighting that title with Dewsbury Hall£30m he could also be the bargain of the season.
He's fighting that title with Dewsbury Hall£30m he could also be the bargain of the season.
You don’t to agree that’s why it’s an opinion they’re all different. Best was a legend my Dads all time favourite. I can see how good he was but imo others did and achieved more in world football and for me that’s why he misses out on a spot.I cant agree with that. George Best had a longer career than many people think.
To not include him in a legends team is wrong.
I watched him from when he first moved over from Ireland. Cruyff was very good but doesnt get near Best.He had everything, balance, left foot right foot, heading, speed and best of all, dribbling ability. And remember, all that on heavy muddy pitches and leather balls.
Its a shame Best didn't achieve much with Northern Ireland.You don’t to agree that’s why it’s an opinion they’re all different. Best was a legend my Dads all time favourite. I can see how good he was but imo others did and achieved more in world football and for me that’s why he misses out on a spot.
Its a shame Best didn't achieve much with Northern Ireland.
However he was instrumental in Manchester Uniteds European Cup win in the sixties.
Maybe a case of, the longer he stays away, the better he looks!Celtic should bring in Martin O'Neill?
If the answer to your problem is a 73 year old that hadn’t managed for 6 years…Celtic should bring in Martin O'Neill?
Probably should have won a World Cup too . The Dutch team in 74 was outstanding ( Germans wasn’t bad either)It’s hard to compare especially in a team environment but that Man Utd team was outstanding
Cruyff did that 3 times on the bounce for Ajax as well as winning the old European Footballer of the year 3 times in 4 years
A lot of times when these sort of discussions happen Cruyff gets forgotten about a little
I cant agree with that. George Best had a longer career than many people think.
To not include him in a legends team is wrong.
I watched him from when he first moved over from Ireland. Cruyff was very good but doesnt get near Best.He had everything, balance, left foot right foot, heading, speed and best of all, dribbling ability. And remember, all that on heavy muddy pitches and leather balls.
Best player I ever saw live and I have seen messi, Ronaldo and CruyffI cant agree with that. George Best had a longer career than many people think.
To not include him in a legends team is wrong.
I watched him from when he first moved over from Ireland. Cruyff was very good but doesnt get near Best.He had everything, balance, left foot right foot, heading, speed and best of all, dribbling ability. And remember, all that on heavy muddy pitches and leather balls.
The year Leicester won it the standard was poor and they only managed 81 points. Arsenal even with some poor results/loads of injuries are on course to get 85.
Would love Villa to win it but can't see it, they look a good side in top form but will probably be 15+ behind the Champions in May.
A very honest non rose tinted glasses opinion. However I think Villa have done very well v City and Arsenal and deserved there results. Keep on the tails of City and Arsenal and it will make it very interesting. Forest very nearly did it last season.I agree with this.
In answer to the other questions - I wont ever say we are because we're just not in a race. Were in a top 4 race and that's it. Champions will be one of two teams - City or Arsenal.
Hope we can do City a favour and beat Arsenal again away but its unlikely!
Forest could win the whole thing. Playing like last season under Dyche.
An opinion is defined as a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
So the number of goals Manchester City have scored, the number of points they have accumulated, the number of trophies won, all of that is absolutely irrelevant. For the most part, I have found their style of football boring. I don’t enjoy it.
There really is nothing else to say, and anyone seeking to beat those of us who hold that opinion over the head with facts is wasting their time and breath.
If you asked me that question, yes (for Barcelona anyway)So you think the Barca side and the Bayern side under Pep were boring too? Because they played the same way in lesser leagues.
Just curious as they have been noted as two of the greatest sides of all time. Barcelona especially. If you think attacking football, record goal hauls and trophies are boring I'd love to know what you base your judgements on entertaining football onPlease don't say a 4-4 draw between two average sides in Utd and Bournemouth
![]()
So you think the Barca side and the Bayern side under Pep were boring too? Because they played the same way in lesser leagues.
Just curious as they have been noted as two of the greatest sides of all time. Barcelona especially. If you think attacking football, record goal hauls and trophies are boring I'd love to know what you base your judgements on entertaining football onPlease don't say a 4-4 draw between two average sides in Utd and Bournemouth
![]()
Sums it up pretty well. Barca, Bayern and City imo under Pep were/are boring sides to watch. Same goes for Arsenal under Arteta which as a Pep protege is hardly surprising. It’s formulaic, dull and yes it’s scores a lot of goals but that’s because they bore team into mistakes and submissionIf you asked me that question, yes (for Barcelona anyway)
When Sky had La Liga, I'd always enjoy watching Real Madrid. Who played entertaining football, that involved risk taking.
I despised watching Barcelona. Even though I would also say they could be the best ever side, and I love Messi. I just hated watching such one sides games, with lots of slow possession based play, etc.
If Arsenal were suddenly asked to play in Scottish League 2, they would dominate every side, and score about 200 goals. Unless you are an Arsenal fan, not many will be entertained by that.
So you think the Barca side and the Bayern side under Pep were boring too? Because they played the same way in lesser leagues.
Just curious as they have been noted as two of the greatest sides of all time. Barcelona especially. If you think attacking football, record goal hauls and trophies are boring I'd love to know what you base your judgements on entertaining football onPlease don't say a 4-4 draw between two average sides in Utd and Bournemouth
![]()