The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Unlucky ladies - not a great final and seemed to get dragged down instead of playing their own game
 
Liverpoolphil said:
You have made a grand total of “zero” posts about the women’s football club until a royal has got involved and you have popped up with your militant anti establishment hat just to have a pop at a royal
Click to expand...

2Blue qualifies his stance in the second sentence of his first post. “… his role in the FA.” And I agree with him, and I’m very much a Royalist. Prince William is the President of the FA, so why isn’t he at the final of the World Cup? I think it’s very poor form.
 
Hobbit said:
2Blue qualifies his stance in the second sentence of his first post. “… his role in the FA.” And I agree with him, and I’m very much a Royalist. Prince William is the President of the FA, so why isn’t he at the final of the World Cup? I think it’s very poor form.
Click to expand...

Prince William clearly shows his reasons why

“Taking such a long flight would involve creating a large carbon footprint, which goes against William’s commitment to tackling climate change. The prince launched the Earthshot Prize in 2019 in an effort to find solutions to repair and regenerate the Earth.”

The same people being critical of him not being there would be jumping right on him if he did make the flight pointing out his “hypocrisy” in regards climate change - he didn’t go to the Men’s World Cup as well

If the figurehead President was a non royal IMO the op wouldn’t have said a word


It’s a shame that the ladies got to the final and some just want to concentrate on anti establishment
 
Hobbit said:
2Blue qualifies his stance in the second sentence of his first post. “… his role in the FA.” And I agree with him, and I’m very much a Royalist. Prince William is the President of the FA, so why isn’t he at the final of the World Cup? I think it’s very poor form.
Click to expand...

Read earlier that there might also be a constitutional reason behind it. Because King Charles hasn't yet visited Australia since he became king Prince William can't visit before him. I don't know enough about the monarchy to know if that's correct or not but could explain it.
 
Liverpoolphil said:
Prince William clearly shows his reasons why

“Taking such a long flight would involve creating a large carbon footprint, which goes against William’s commitment to tackling climate change. The prince launched the Earthshot Prize in 2019 in an effort to find solutions to repair and regenerate the Earth.”

The same people being critical of him not being there would be jumping right on him if he did make the flight pointing out his “hypocrisy” in regards climate change - he didn’t go to the Men’s World Cup as well

If the figurehead President was a non royal IMO the op wouldn’t have said a word


It’s a shame that the ladies got to the final and some just want to concentrate on anti establishment
Click to expand...
He's the president of the FA .! It's the countries biggest match since 66 we are told , so should have been there.
 
Liverpoolphil said:
Prince William clearly shows his reasons why

“Taking such a long flight would involve creating a large carbon footprint, which goes against William’s commitment to tackling climate change. The prince launched the Earthshot Prize in 2019 in an effort to find solutions to repair and regenerate the Earth.”

The same people being critical of him not being there would be jumping right on him if he did make the flight pointing out his “hypocrisy” in regards climate change - he didn’t go to the Men’s World Cup as well

If the figurehead President was a non royal IMO the op wouldn’t have said a word


It’s a shame that the ladies got to the final and some just want to concentrate on anti establishment
Click to expand...
Do you think that the same reason and absence would exist if it were the men's team in the final of a WC?
 
GreiginFife said:
Do you think that the same reason and absence would exist if it were the men's team in the final of a WC?
Click to expand...


He didn’t go to the Men’s World Cup and had no plans to go even if the men’s team got to the final - is hasn’t made the choice because it’s only the Ladies - would expect people to see he has a bit more about than that
 
Liverpoolphil said:
He didn’t go to the Men’s World Cup and had no plans to go even if the men’s team got to the final - is hasn’t made the choice because it’s only the Ladies - would expect people to see he has a bit more about than that
Click to expand...
Fair enough, I had no clue hence the question. As president of the English FA it makes zero odds to me.

But certainly the role as president should be separated from his role as a Royal as I would not expect to see him at a final if Scotland were involved.

Ok, that’s a stretch having Scotland involved in finals let alone THE final, but my point stands.
 
GreiginFife said:
Fair enough, I had no clue hence the question. As president of the English FA it makes zero odds to me.

But certainly the role as president should be separated from his role as a Royal as I would not expect to see him at a final if Scotland were involved.

Ok, that’s a stretch having Scotland involved in finals let alone THE final, but my point stands.
Click to expand...



If he had turned up last year and also to other events then I could understand the criticism- but at least Imo he is being consistent with his views when it comes to his reasons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hobbit
Another footie thread
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
WorldHandicapSystem
W
road2ruin
Fantasy Footie 25/26
2 3 4
Replies
79
Views
3K
road2ruin
road2ruin
C
Weather apps
2
Replies
20
Views
437
jim8flog
jim8flog
SwingsitlikeHogan
Rental Rights Act
2
Replies
24
Views
2K
jim8flog
jim8flog
jim8flog
Golf or football
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
Voyager EMH
Voyager EMH
Top