3offTheTee
Tour Rookie
Are Liverpool still owed around 20 million for Coutinho? I was told that figure recentlyCome on Phil, Coutinho forced a move, it was never about balancing the books! Klopp new who he wanted.
Are Liverpool still owed around 20 million for Coutinho? I was told that figure recentlyCome on Phil, Coutinho forced a move, it was never about balancing the books! Klopp new who he wanted.
I’m not criticising FSG, I wish our idiots would learn from them. But I have read Lpool fans questioning some of their behaviour.The club is worth that because of the progress that’s been made since they bought the club - Investment into a club can be more than just financially, they have put in place the right people in the right roles , either in the transfers or coaching and financial team. The club is worlds away from when they bought us - 16th in the league , just knocked out of the League Cup by Northampton- a team full of players like Koncheskey.
They have helped move the club forward on and off the pitch and if they do sell the club ( which I don’t see happening ) and get a profit then that’s a sign of the improvements of the club that were made under their ownership.
FSG haven’t been perfect , made some errors - furlough , ticket prices and super league to name a few but they have shown they want the club to be a success - with the Prem not ever following the 50+1 model they have in Germany then I’m not sure what owners in the Prem I would swap for
I’d prefer the Chelsea/City way to Arsenal/Spurs or Utd tbh.To me, it's the difference between running the football club as a business - which is what most PL teams are - and using/running it more like a toy/hobby - which is how Chelsea and Man City are.
Kroenke (Arsenal), Lewis/Levy (Tottenham), Glazers (Man U) and Fenway(Liverpool) are all involved in running sports related businesses in US. The owners of Chelsea and Man City are in decidedly different circumstances - and their football clubs are run more as a hobby!
No idea.Are Liverpool still owed around 20 million for Coutinho? I was told that figure recently
Jack Walker was born in Blackburn employed around 3,500 before he sold out to British Steel. He invested in BRFC slightly before 1990 to help the building of a stand and contribute towards the wages of Steve Archibald and Ossis Ardiles. When walker died and it was passed on to The Walker family trust all they wanted was to get out and sell. Obviously they backed the wrong horse with Venky’s but during the last few years they have invested/supported the Club in difficult times.Blackburn Rovers (from 1990 to present day), who, for me, started the 'hugely wealthy and ambitious owner' process, demonstrate the difference between good and bad owners - irrespective of their wealth!
I think that's view of the majority of fans. But (clubs as toys aside) that's not one that promotes longevity. Just remember what happened to Blackburn!I’d prefer the Chelsea/City way to Arsenal/Spurs or Utd tbh.
Fans want to see success not spreadsheets.
Are Liverpool still owed around 20 million for Coutinho? I was told that figure recently
I’m not criticising FSG, I wish our idiots would learn from them. But I have read Lpool fans questioning some of their behaviour.
Sadly we’ll never have 1 way of doing things in the PL as you could never level all the Clubs to have the same start, plus I don’t think it should be anyway.
Indeed...Jack Walker - good; Venkys - horrendous!Jack Walker was born in Blackburn employed around 3,500 before he sold out to British Steel. He invested in BRFC slightly before 1990 to help the building of a stand and contribute towards the wages of Steve Archibald and Ossis Ardiles. When walker died and it was passed on to The Walker family trust all they wanted was to get out and sell. Obviously they backed the wrong horse with Venky’s but during the last few years they have invested/supported the Club in difficult times.
A fairly typical (success NOW) attitude of fans.I’d prefer the Chelsea/City way to Arsenal/Spurs or Utd tbh.
Fans want to see success not spreadsheets.
Rubbish, no one said success now, Newcastle fans know it won’t come overnight, but they want to see progression, Utd fans have seen regression, I wonder what they’d prefer.A fairly typical (success NOW) attitude of fans.
can we have a separate LFC thread plse![]()
Becuase you've had a good run in the transfer market where the majority of your buys have done well. A bit like saints having a 3 year stint where they mixed with best of rest.i know I’ll regret this but if it’s unrealistic how come Liverpool managed to win the league and CL doing it and challenging again this season ?
The majority of buys have done well because the right players have been recruited by the club and I see no reason for that to stopBecuase you've had a good run in the transfer market where the majority of your buys have done well. A bit like saints having a 3 year stint where they mixed with best of rest.
You have a higher base level so may sustain it a bit. But if mane and Salah refuse new deals. That's 2 big transfer fees missed out on. So if you (Liverpool) continue to self suatain. That's a lot of goals to replace very cheaply ...
The majority of buys have done well because the right players have been recruited by the club and I see no reason for that to stop
I’m pretty confident that they have plans in place if Mané and Mo move on - and recent purchases of Jota and Diaz show they are looking to the future
A fairly typical (success NOW) attitude of fans.
All the money for Coutinho is now paid up
There are two types that “question” them - the ones that weren’t happy and rightly so with the ESL , Furlough etc - and the owners held their hands up and admitted they were wrong and hopefully they learn from it
And the other type that look at other clubs spending money from owners pocket or loans etc and ask why are owners don’t do the same - they point to clubs like Brighton etc having bigger net spend and for those fans the transfer window and net spend are two biggest negatives it seems against FSG. Some fans have zero trust in the recruitment and just want to see money spent thinking that’s going to see the club “dominate”
Isn’t that the point though mate? Pre RA the PL was won 8 times by Utd, 3 by Arsenal and Blackburn, RA’s approach woke other Clubs up and now more teams are in with a shout.
As for spends etc, absolutely agree the Lpool approach would be ideal for everyone, but that’s today’s position and if you choose to ignore the previous 15-20yrs and we’ll never have a level starting point to get there.
Utd did spend a bit, not Chelsea or City standard, but certainly a lot relative to the period, Blomquist, Stam, O’Shea, Yorke plus others in 1 season, Carroll, Ruud van Nistelrooy, Verón, Laurent Blanc and Diego Forlán in one other etc.
If any Club should get stick for spends and how they are run, it is Utd, just look at the debt their owners have caused, where as Chelsea have been debt free since 2008.
So to pick RA out and lay all the issues of the PL on him is unfair as previously said, the PL issues started before him and were made worse after him.
Look at the were the majority of Clubs get their money from and why? Maybe they should be thanking RA for spending the way he did as I believe every PL Club has benefitted from the knock on effect.
Not really, when you have had chairmen like Peter Swales and Franny Lee ? those years were purgatory.