• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
I expected Rangnik to get more out of United. Nice to see me being proven wrong. Schadenfreude if a big club doesn’t get the results they want.
 
Good, long overdue him and his money are out of this country

His money will still be within the club and don’t see him being out of the club

It’s a move to ensure the club don’t get frozen and the staff and players etc still get paid
 
That’s a huge mistake from VAR - how can Kavanagh see that and say “not clear enough evidence” ?!

Arm out - the ball hits his arm - can see it clear as day

How many angles did they have as well

Can’t blame the ref
 
His money will still be within the club and don’t see him being out of the club

It’s a move to ensure the club don’t get frozen and the staff and players etc still get paid

I don’t really know the details but can’t see him being involved with the club much longer and can’t see how he could be allowed to invest any more money in the club.
 
I don’t really know the details but can’t see him being involved with the club much longer and can’t see how he could be allowed to invest any more money in the club.

The club runs pretty much self sufficient now anyway so doesn’t need too much investment from him , there won’t be too much affect for Chelsea
 
I missed the handball/penalty incident as dinner was on the go but heard talk of not being given due to offside in the build up?

Got to look at the positives because it was a decent performance in a game we were never going to win. Only conceding one goal is a minor victory for us.
 
That’s a huge mistake from VAR - how can Kavanagh see that and say “not clear enough evidence” ?!

Arm out - the ball hits his arm - can see it clear as day

How many angles did they have as well

Can’t blame the ref

Was there actually a shot that showed, without any shadow of a doubt, exactly what part of his arm it hit? No, there wasn't. Paul Tierney was completely blindside, so no fault there. Was there sufficient evidence of a clear and obvious error? No.

Sly showing a still shot from the back after the contact is not proof of a penalty, only of their agenda to stir the :poop: to promote interest in their product.
 
Was there actually a shot that showed, without any shadow of a doubt, exactly what part of his arm it hit? No, there wasn't. Paul Tierney was completely blindside, so no fault there. Was there sufficient evidence of a clear and obvious error? No.

Sly showing a still shot from the back after the contact is not proof of a penalty, only of their agenda to stir the :poop: to promote interest in their product.
Maybe he was lucky his sleeve was hanging low. Had it been pulled slightly more up his arm, probably a definite handball as it would be clear it touched below it. Handball is nothing to do with arm anymore, it is to do with how long a player's sleeves are and whether ball hits above or below :)
 
Was there actually a shot that showed, without any shadow of a doubt, exactly what part of his arm it hit? No, there wasn't. Paul Tierney was completely blindside, so no fault there. Was there sufficient evidence of a clear and obvious error? No.

Sly showing a still shot from the back after the contact is not proof of a penalty, only of their agenda to stir the :poop: to promote interest in their product.


Couple of pictures show from the front as well
 
The club runs pretty much self sufficient now anyway so doesn’t need too much investment from him , there won’t be too much affect for Chelsea

So do you think if they are to stay at the top they won’t need his money to invest in players for the next 2/3 years? Which could cost £100s of millions?
 
He's handed the stewardship of the club to Chelsea's charitable foundation, but I'm convinced he'll still be running the club from behind that particular barricade.
 
That’s a huge mistake from VAR - how can Kavanagh see that and say “not clear enough evidence” ?!

Arm out - the ball hits his arm - can see it clear as day

How many angles did they have as well

Can’t blame the ref
How many is that so far for kavanagh this season as the var?
 
So do you think if they are to stay at the top they won’t need his money to invest in players for the next 2/3 years? Which could cost £100s of millions?

They managed to get Lukaku in and all those others in by selling players - Chelsea have been self sufficient for a while now and have built up their financial income to ensure they don’t rely on the owners money

They have a lot of players that can be sold to generate funds
 
clear handball, unless against the league leaders lol

We had a 10 page discussion about this the other week. For some reason the FA have decided that an arm finishes where the shirt sleeve starts. So half of the upper arm is deemed not an arm. ? I said the other week when a similar incident happened it was rammel. I still stand by it. That was a nailed on handball by Rodrigo. But the powers that be deem it not to be. The only thing positive was that they are consistent in enforcing a rubbish rule.
 
And the left hand one appears to clearly show the ball in contact with the shirt. Ergo no penalty,
5DC3EA62-AA84-45B3-8A22-BD9354228904.jpeg
?‍♂️
We had a 10 page discussion about this the other week. For some reason the FA have decided that an arm finishes where the shirt sleeve starts. So half of the upper arm is deemed not an arm. ? I said the other week when a similar incident happened it was rammel. I still stand by it. That was a nailed on handball by Rodrigo. But the powers that be deem it not to be. The only thing positive was that they are consistent in enforcing a rubbish rule.

Tell that to Wolves

 
Top