pokerjoke
Money List Winner
Screamer lmao he was 7 yards outoutstanding. I've been saying one of his runs is going to end with a screamer for ages and that was just brilliant. top class finish!
Screamer lmao he was 7 yards outoutstanding. I've been saying one of his runs is going to end with a screamer for ages and that was just brilliant. top class finish!
Because the management aren’t making knee jerk reactions like other clubs ??How’s Bielsa still in his job
Shocking tactician
Oh dear Michael Owen.
Well said Chris Sutton
Owen just goes to prove again what an utter plank he is. Sutton is absolutely right, football still toys with this issue. I can't remember the game but last weekend there was a televised game where a player had a bad head injury, carried on, came off 5 minutes later all over the shop. He should never have been allowed to continue.
Can someone remind me if the concussion protocols are being driven by the PL or is it a new UEFA/FIFA instruction? It seems very hit and miss and Sutton has nailed it. I think it was a Leeds player at the weekend (stand to be corrected) that had a head injury and carried on for a while before coming off. It seems common sense as GB72 states not to simply put a player on straight away even if that means naming the normal number of subs and then a couple of HI subs who only play for head injuries. An independent doctor would be preferential but I assume if this is supposed to be filtered down through the EFL as well then cost becomes an issue
If rugby clubs can afford it then at least a couple of leagues down should be able to. Clubs have shown that they are incapable of making the right call on players when there is a head injury and so it needs to be independent. The sub does not count as a substituion unless the injured player cannot return and then it is a permenant substituion and one of the 3 allowed.
I agree clubs should be able to afford it but if you took a Derby or another club in financial peril would they really be able to deal with that additional cost and what about those at the lower ends of the EFL? I totally agree that the subs should be a simple job to manage and simple to implement
Kneejerk?? They've conceded more goals than anyone else and only won 5 games. They could be in serious trouble given that the three teams below them have games in hand. In many ways they've kind of seamlessly replaced Bournemouth.Because the management aren’t making knee jerk reactions like other clubs ??
In defence of the clubs, and I'm no doctor when I say this, but it appears that the signs of concussion are not always immediately obvious to the physios that are on the pitch? Are the symptoms instant, or do they take a few minutes to come on? If they are instant, are they similar to general shock a player might be suffering after a bang on the head and therefore easily confused. I believe the Leeds doctors informed the player to sit down immediately on the pitch if they felt groggy, which is what happened, and then he was subbed.If rugby clubs can afford it then at least a couple of leagues down should be able to. Clubs have shown that they are incapable of making the right call on players when there is a head injury and so it needs to be independent. The sub does not count as a substituion unless the injured player cannot return and then it is a permenant substituion and one of the 3 allowed.
In defence of the clubs, and I'm no doctor when I say this, but it appears that the signs of concussion are not always immediately obvious to the physios that are on the pitch? Are the symptoms instant, or do they take a few minutes to come on? If they are instant, are they similar to general shock a player might be suffering after a bang on the head and therefore easily confused. I believe the Leeds doctors informed the player to sit down immediately on the pitch if they felt groggy, which is what happened, and then he was subbed.
So, I think what Sutton and others say makes absolute sense (and I very much dislike Sutton in most other senses). Enforce a temporary sub any time a player goes down due to a clash of heads, with the injured player not allowed to return for 10 minutes (or whatever an appropriate time is to make a suitable diagnosis). Hopefully by then, the club can be confident the health of the player, and I'd very much hope that even if it was only a club doctor assessing this, they would not send a player back on if they were feeling dizzy or groggy.
Blimey, come on. He's been getting to the edge of the box and having pot shots. So I've been saying he's going to smash one in. Ergo a screamer.Screamer lmao he was 7 yards out
There needs to be some new head injury protocols. But there needs to be some very carefully considered rules. I don’t think just bringing on any sub is the right thing. It will get used tactically very quickly.
They should start using VAR to help judge if a player has been knocked out or not. It's been sod all use for anything else so far, so they might as well do something positive with it.That is why they have the assessment process. Impact to the head, doctor signals the ref (or the ref can call it) and the player is pulled for 10 minutes to have a full assessment. That takes any maybe out of the situation. You pass the assessment and you are back on after 10 minutes and the sub that replaced you comes off and it does not count as a subsitution. Assessment fails and you stay off and the sub stays on. Just seems safer that way. Also means not knee jerk medical decisions and gives time for a proper assessment. At the moment, players are losing consciousness, even briefly and playing on. In rugby a loss of consciousness means immediately subbed off, no need for an HIA you are sitting the rest of it out.
They should start using VAR to help judge if a player has been knocked out or not. It's been sod all use for anything else so far, so they might as well do something positive with it.