ColchesterFC
Journeyman Pro
The problem is players aren't versatile anymore either. In the 90s and 2000s you had players who could play a number of positions. Now they're all "defensive midfielder" or "number 10" or "inverted winger" and they can only do one job - ask them to be a bit flexible for the England team and they fail. It's fine at club level because managers bring in the players they need for their system. For England though - as you say - we're left with square pegs and rounds holes. What we need is some versatile shapeshifting pegs!
I'd disagree. We've been through the versatile/utility players before. Someone like Milner, who is no doubt a very good player, can fill in at left back or defensive midfield etc but isn't the best player for either of those positions. A useful squad player for a tournament when you need cover for different positions but why not just pick your two best players for each position? If we go in to a tournament knowing we're going to play 4-2-3-1 for example, our squad should be our 2 best right and left backs, 4 best centre backs, 4 best defensive midfielders, 6 best attacking midfielders and 2 best strikers. Add in three keepers and that's our 23 man squad. The only possible concession is if you have someone that almost makes it as an automatic choice but can fill in elsewhere (like Milner) then they might get picked instead of the 4th best choice.