Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
That’s correct and it was the correct decision, so how did it favour a big club as you mentioned.You mean the one where the assistant ref flagged for offside and VAR confirmed the decision?
That’s correct and it was the correct decision, so how did it favour a big club as you mentioned.You mean the one where the assistant ref flagged for offside and VAR confirmed the decision?
It didn't favour anyone. Had it not been in use, the same decision would have been made.That’s correct and it was the correct decision, so how did it favour a big club as you mentioned.
Exactly, but I was not the one that suggested VAR is favouring the big clubs post 15298 ?It didn't favour anyone. Had it not been in use, the same decision would have been made.
But you are just picking one incident that is unrelated to the point being suggested in that post.Exactly, but I was not the one that suggested VAR is favouring the big clubs post 15298 ?
Exactly, if someone suggests VAR is favouring big clubs and a correct decision suggests otherwise, why is it wrong to suggest the initial comment is wrong. And how exactly is it unrelated, when VAR overturned a decision it is 100% related.But you are just picking one incident that is unrelated to the point being suggested in that post.
But you are just picking one incident that is unrelated to the point being suggested in that post.
Exactly, if someone suggests VAR is favouring big clubs and a correct decision suggests otherwise, why is it wrong to suggest the initial comment is wrong. And how exactly is it unrelated, when VAR overturned a decision it is 100% related.
I don't think you understand the definition of "overturned" which is unfortunate.Exactly, if someone suggests VAR is favouring big clubs and a correct decision suggests otherwise, why is it wrong to suggest the initial comment is wrong. And how exactly is it unrelated, when VAR overturned a decision it is 100% related.
Exactly, if someone suggests VAR is favouring big clubs and a correct decision suggests otherwise, why is it wrong to suggest the initial comment is wrong. And how exactly is it unrelated, when VAR overturned a decision it is 100% related.
No doubt the German cheerleader would have been trying to influence the officialsPalace unlucky not to have been given a penalty against Liverpool when the score was 0-0. I wonder what the decision would have been if a Liverpool player had gone down under that challenge in front of the Kop.
They think a yellow is worth paying to show off their muscles. Or, they think they have a vitally important message to get across by writing a message on their under shirt. VanityWhy do players take their shirt off after scoring?
They know it’s a yellow,idiots.
So that's Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City who all should have had penalties awarded against them today but didn't. I'm sure that it's all just a coincidence that they happen to be three of the big 6 teams playing against smaller clubs. VAR should be binned and just let the refs get it wrong on their own in favour of the big teams like the good old days.
They think a yellow is worth paying to show off their muscles. Or, they think they have a vitally important message to get across by writing a message on their under shirt. Vanity
So that's Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City who all should have had penalties awarded against them today but didn't. I'm sure that it's all just a coincidence that they happen to be three of the big 6 teams playing against smaller clubs. VAR should be binned and just let the refs get it wrong on their own in favour of the big teams like the good old days.
Not seen a definitive reply of the Benteke one but they said on 5Live it the exact type of challenge that would have resulted in a penalty last season because there was “contact” but this season with the contact having to be one that makes the player go down as opposed to the player going down feeling the contact ?