clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Yes as the law stands it’s wrong!Seeing it again and that’s a ridiculous decision to disallow it
Yes as the law stands it’s wrong!Seeing it again and that’s a ridiculous decision to disallow it
I’ve said it a few times this season I think Slot is trying to be to cute with his tactics and rather than playing the natural football of the players he has he’s trying to be to much like Arteta and Pep by using his Full backs inverted to lack the midfield but you don’t have the players to do it. So what happens is you open up so much space down the wings and Doku etc getting in behind time and again.I agree
But why do we bring the full backs in so narrow?
Doku has chalk on his boots so Bradley needs to stop the ball getting to him by staying a bit wider
VAR showing its inconsistency again with that offside decision.
He’s never in the keepers eyeline
But he’s in the six yd box so imo is interfering.
What part of the rule ?I’ve said it a few times this season I think Slot is trying to be to cute with his tactics and rather than playing the natural football of the players he has he’s trying to be to much like Arteta and Pep by using his Full backs inverted to lack the midfield but you don’t have the players to do it. So what happens is you open up so much space down the wings and Doku etc getting in behind time and again.
I actually agree with the offside. It’s harsh I agree but based on the path the ball takes and the current ruling he technically is interfering as you see he has to duck for the ball to pass him. I don’t agree with it but that’s the rule so based on that he is interfering.
Yes as the law stands it’s wrong!
I'm not saying Bradley is playing badly. Simply that Doku has been miles better than Junior, and really testing BradleyI would argue the opposite. From what I’m watching he’s the only Liverpool player that can hold their head up as putting in a shift. Doku has been a major threat but Bradley is working his ass off and standing up to it. The rest of the team might as well have stayed on the bus!
Can argue all you like about what part of the rule it’s my opinion the decision is right. He ducks to allow the ball to pass him that itself can be argued it interferes with the keeper seeing the path.What part of the rule ?
He is not in the keepers eyeline and didn’t try to play the ball.
I agree but the rule dosnt say that atm.I think the Liverpool goal should be ruled out.
For me you can’t be in the 6 yard box and not interfering with play.
The problem is next week it would be allowed to stand and that’s my issue with VAR.
This could get very messy second half if it continues in the same vein.
Yeah VAR was brought in to stop the inconsistency and they even changed the rules to try and make it fit.I agree but the rule dosnt say that atm.
It’s one of them you don’t like given against you .
Even though we have seen plenty the same given and not given.
So inconsistent.
Starting to wonder if he has a clause in his contract that states he has to play. I cannot see why he is still on the starting line up this season.Time for Salah to retire
Hallalua.Time for Salah to retire
Can they take Salah instead.!Perhaps Liverpool could loan Wirtz out to a German club?
Just watching the Post match interview. It would be refreshing to hear a reporter ask Slot why are you persisting on playing Salah to garner a genuine response for you as fans to understand the rest of us to figure why.Can they take Salah instead.!
I said this a long time ago.Just watching the Post match interview. It would be refreshing to hear a reporter ask Slot why are you persisting on playing Salah to garner a genuine response for you as fans to understand the rest of us to figure why.