The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
I don’t think there is any doubt that Radcliffe is an outstandingly successful businessman and has proven that beyond all doubt

But being a successful businessman and getting a football team successful is two different things

There have been many successful businessmen who haven’t been able to find success in sport

Man Utd is the 3rd club under the INEOS umbrella- the other two aren’t pulling up trees

He will no doubt help reduce some running costs - but the main reason for them losing so much money is the poor recruitment and the debt as opposed to meals in the canteen or a £40k fund for ex players

The key will be the appointments - so far imo he has failed a few times now with key appointments

The next one ( who replaces Ashworth ) will be the big one , get that wrong and the slide downwards could be even worse

And as I’ve said all along, Ratcliffe is responsible for building a team who themselves will be responsible for bringing success out on the pitch.

INEOS got it wrong with Ashworth. The suggestion is they will not be seeking to replace him, at least in the short term.

But Ratcliffe is not a football manager. He is a businessman, whose primary function at United is to get the right people and systems in place to allow Amorim, and the playing staff, to do their jobs.

There will be bumps in the road. But as most pundits have been saying for a decade or more, United have not had a hope of being successful on the pitch given the chaos behind the scenes.
 
Will Newcastle have enough to beat Liverpool in the league cup final….
Allison should start in goals for me as well, he’s a much better keeper and you should start your strongest 11 available.
 
Top