I don’t think there is any doubt that Radcliffe is an outstandingly successful businessman and has proven that beyond all doubt
But being a successful businessman and getting a football team successful is two different things
There have been many successful businessmen who haven’t been able to find success in sport
Man Utd is the 3rd club under the INEOS umbrella- the other two aren’t pulling up trees
He will no doubt help reduce some running costs - but the main reason for them losing so much money is the poor recruitment and the debt as opposed to meals in the canteen or a £40k fund for ex players
The key will be the appointments - so far imo he has failed a few times now with key appointments
The next one ( who replaces Ashworth ) will be the big one , get that wrong and the slide downwards could be even worse
And as I’ve said all along, Ratcliffe is responsible for building a team who themselves will be responsible for bringing success out on the pitch.
INEOS got it wrong with Ashworth. The suggestion is they will not be seeking to replace him, at least in the short term.
But Ratcliffe is not a football manager. He is a businessman, whose primary function at United is to get the right people and systems in place to allow Amorim, and the playing staff, to do their jobs.
There will be bumps in the road. But as most pundits have been saying for a decade or more, United have not had a hope of being successful on the pitch given the chaos behind the scenes.