Nonsense yourself, you don't know what your talking about. I've been installing multi-satellite systems for over twenty years and it is only the British public that would put up with the Sky prices and adverts on a subscription service. The British just moan and don't do anything about it. Easy to get a European card and system nowadays, search for "Broadcasting without frontiers" which the EU are pushing.
Nonsense yourself, you don't know what your talking about. I've been installing multi-satellite systems for over twenty years and it is only the British public that would put up with the Sky prices and adverts on a subscription service. The British just moan and don't do anything about it. Easy to get a European card and system nowadays, search for "Broadcasting without frontiers" which the EU are pushing.
Precisely. A complete nonsense of a post. The US broadcasters simply do not allow foreign broadcasters to set-up shop on the PGA tour, continental European or not.
I bow down to your technical expertise. Ignorance is bliss, hope you enjoy the 20 minutes of adverts / hour! :lol:
No,factual.
Nah I only worked for BSkyB for 15 years. Wouldn't know a thing about it. Adverts on a subscription service is nothing new. But the point was that the coverage is fed from a US supplier. You could certainly watch the inane chatter that takes place every two minutes and then sections of black screen where they do "sponsor messages" every other two minutes (which for most BSkyB CANNOT show in the UK due to product or licence restrictions)
But as I say, what would I know
An unbiased view then? There was no excuse for Sky UK's coverage of the Ryder cup it was minutes behind the European coverage in order to show adverts - which the European broadcasters were not showing.
Why is there a weather delay? The BBC wouldn't have weather delays!!
Not completely fair to say Sky has no control or it’s not their fault. They knew what they were buying and agreed that this is what they’d get
While it’s probably impractical commercially/contractually, other feeds do exist and if enough cash was offered then they could be secured by a broadcaster
Actually with enough money on offer we could be watching footage from Rory’s Cap-Cam as he plays his round or a live feed of what happens in Tigers hotel room when he’s on the course (if a broadcaster thought that was worth it) as well as commercial free coverage for 10 hours a day
So Sky (or any broadcaster) is absolutely in control of and responsible for what they show, it just depends on what they are prepared to pay for. Once the deal is done however then they have little control to show more/less
Count yourself very very lucky.
It could be wumans golf.
You would all be within your rights to be moaning then.
As simplistic as you make it sound its not quite that easy. The US PGA are notoriously protrctive of live feeds, businesses can offer as much money as they like but if someone isng willing to sell then thats that. Outside of thr continental US of A there is also problems with adverts and sponsor messages due to product and/or licensing restrictions.
I know a few guys from broadcast marketong that worked on the last rights deal and they said it was painful and that the US PGA were a nightmare to deal with, NFL was much easier as they were more open to the throwing money at them idea.
I am appalled at the Sky coverage...I only managed to watch an hour or so last night but there was no coverage at all of Sarah Stirk
Nonsense yourself, you don't know what your talking about. I've been installing multi-satellite systems for over twenty years and it is only the British public that would put up with the Sky prices and adverts on a subscription service. The British just moan and don't do anything about it. Easy to get a European card and system nowadays, search for "Broadcasting without frontiers" which the EU are pushing.