No, none of the above. I shall not reveal where I heard it but it is a lot more reliable than those.
there are always people who think they are in the know, they do more harm that good with their fishwives gossip:angry:
No, none of the above. I shall not reveal where I heard it but it is a lot more reliable than those.
there are always people who think they are in the know, they do more harm that good with their fishwives gossip:angry:
Fish wives gossip :clap:, I wish I could tell you who told me.
well they cant be in a senior professional position, as betraying that position of importance just wouldnt be professional now would it? and then he told you, who then comes and posts it on a world internet forum
like I said, the world is full of these types who crave attention by saying they are 'in the know'......but you didn't hear it from me, right:rofl:
No its not different circumstances, theres players coming forward with all sorts of allegations against Dyson, the ET wouldnt be going to all this trouble for a one off incident.why? completely different circumstances, Saltman did it on at least 5 known occasions eluding to premeditated thinking. Dyson's action looks to have been a reflex reaction to suddenly spotting a spike mark right in front of his ball when marking. I do believe he realised straight after but maybe was too embarrassed to bring it to anyones attention, but as he never said straight away we will never know.
I hope he just gets a fine and a slap on the wrists for a mistake, a ban affecting his whole career is far to harsh and doesnt reflect the seriousness of the action...IMO
....... a reflex reaction to suddenly spotting a spike mark right in front of his ball when marking
No its not different circumstances, theres players coming forward with all sorts of allegations against Dyson, the ET wouldnt be going to all this trouble for a one off incident.
Therein lies the proplem ....perhaps? I struggle to control mine sometimes lol
As I said above, I'm sure the panel will consider all the evidence and come to a fair decision based on the known facts. I've been involved in the past with a similar hearing (county player) and believe me it's difficult to prove anything. One thing I would add though is that the burden of proof is only "the balance of probability" rather than "beyond reasonable doubt" so they don't need concrete proof, just to be sure that cheating is the most plausible explanation of the actions.
Or maybe he does know someone in the know and has been kind enough to pass on some info to us all.
Not everyone is "craving attention"
well they cant be in a senior professional position, as betraying that position of importance just wouldnt be professional now would it? and then he told you, who then comes and posts it on a world internet forum
like I said, the world is full of these types who crave attention by saying they are 'in the know'......but you didn't hear it from me, right:rofl:
No its not different circumstances, theres players coming forward with all sorts of allegations against Dyson, the ET wouldnt be going to all this trouble for a one off incident.
this one certainly is, it's why they do it, basic human psychology
..kind enough to pass on some hearsay.............lol, seriously!
I dont see how you cannot see the different circumstances even when you have the facts laid out
Where are you getting the information about other players coming forward with all sorts of allegations? link please
The person I spoke to didn't say "You didn't hear it from me" it is all common knowledge stuff on tour, I just think it best to keep his name out of it. I'm sorry if I offended your obviously impeccable scruples. Any inside the tour info I get in future I will be sure to keep to myself for fear of offending anyone.![]()
How do you know he is ?
You don't know him to be able to see any basic human psychology
I could say you always get those naysayers who dismiss anything and everything but that would be unfair of me to make personal judgements on a forum.
I have been told by someone that works in the media department ( events ) of the ET that some players have given evidence
Now you can believe that or you can accuse me of "craving attention"