Roll Back Discussion
- Thread starter Imurg
- Start date
Swango1980
Well-known member
I guess when you've recently become the Team Captain of a team called the Crushers, the reaction in to be expected
jim8flog
Journeyman Pro
The Cayman ball was originally made for the course on the Cayman Isle (Jack Nicklaus and Co designed and built) and you are only allowed to play that ball there.
Swango1980
Well-known member
Unless you are Patrick Reed
I think there was one in Canada too that used its own ball, Volvik I think it was called had one ofvtue balls and it went nowhere
JonnyGutteridge
Newbie
An interesting image taken from Twitter.
St Andrews - showing the current "back" tees for the pros vs the previous green locations.
I guess, the argument FOR the changes are that not all courses have the resources/land to actually achieve this. And that renders them unable to host pro events. The course needs to be like 7000+.
But I am inclined to agree with Justin Thomas. The game of golf does not benefit from any of this. It's solving a problem that doesn't really exist or is being managed accordingly by lengthening of courses etc.
Backsticks
Assistant Pro
Collateral damage maybe. But golf governance is looking at the big picture, not one person.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Are they ?
there only looking at the big hitters I thought.
Crow
Crow Person
In today's game, that's everyone.
SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
Without reading all previous posts I apologise if this has been said.
The word being used is 'Bifurcation' where Tour Pros have different rules with respect to playing equipment.
The word being used is 'Bifurcation' where Tour Pros have different rules with respect to playing equipment.
garyinderry
Ryder Cup Winner
Have they announced how they are actually going to do it.
What is the physics behind it?
What is the physics behind it?
evemccc
Well-known member
I’m all for bifurcation - I think people are deluding themselves if they think they’re playing the same courses with the same set-up as the pros have
Swango1980
Well-known member
Actually, for anyone that watches pro golf, I'm pretty sure we all know we don't play the same courses as the pros. They are quite a bit better than us. And, I'm glad they don't play the same courses as us with dumbed down equipment. If they did play the same courses, I'd want to see them go round in sub 60. At my last course, there would be 6-7 driveable par 4's and 2 par 5's for them to enjoy
SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
Probably golf balls that carry less, maybe lower COR in the faces of metal woods. Higher lofts on irons?
Wabinez
Journeyman Pro
the testing procedure for the ball will change. currently, the ball can’t travel further than 317 yards (+3 yards for tolerance) when swung at 120mph. There are some other launch conditions like spin and launch angle included too
the new balls would be able to go no further than 317 yards (+3 for tolerance) when swung at 127mph.
Barking_Mad
Well-known member
Downhill and down wind too.
Last edited:
It's all about the ball. Presumably they will take a few dimples off the ball, enlarge them, reduce them etc. In effect, reverse engineer the improvements of recent years.
When you see the tech, air flow, compression etc, it can't be hard to make them slightly less efficient than they were before. They have set down parameters post #437, just tweak the dimples until they hit them
Crow
Crow Person
The easiest way is to reduce the maximum weight slightly, that would also give a simple method of testing compliancy for all golfers, should they make it a rule for all in the future.
D
Deleted member 1147
Guest
Region3
Ryder Cup Winner
Jeez this thread moves quick!
Just my tuppence on the subject…..
Although some people are saying the ball goes too far now, I don’t think that is what this mlr is about. The bigger problem will be in 20 years time when current trends suggest it will be going another 20 yards.
I think if this ends up being put in place, most tours will adopt it. If a hole plays great the way it is now and you then use a ball that goes 15 yards less - move the tees forwards 15 yards. Not rocket surgery. If the tee is already as far back as it can go what are you going to do in the future when the ball goes further than now if nothing is done to halt the trend?
“Regular” golfers will never have to use the new ball, although no doubt some will try it.
Just my tuppence on the subject…..
Although some people are saying the ball goes too far now, I don’t think that is what this mlr is about. The bigger problem will be in 20 years time when current trends suggest it will be going another 20 yards.
I think if this ends up being put in place, most tours will adopt it. If a hole plays great the way it is now and you then use a ball that goes 15 yards less - move the tees forwards 15 yards. Not rocket surgery. If the tee is already as far back as it can go what are you going to do in the future when the ball goes further than now if nothing is done to halt the trend?
“Regular” golfers will never have to use the new ball, although no doubt some will try it.
Similar threads
