spongebob59
Journeyman Pro
Mystery solved
Great point. I've been playing Anser type putters for decades. My gamer is a fifteen year old Odyssey. I also have a Scottie Cameron Newport type that is more than a decade old. It appears now most of the tour guys are playing mallets. I think Scheffler's putting really got better when he switched to a mallet. Putting is the strongest part of my game and I'm too old to switch.I didn't watch the video, but why do so many putters emulate/copy the Ping Anser that Karsten Solheim (an engineer) designed nearly 70 years ago? Because the weight is at the heel and the toe and that minimizes twisting(torque) on off centre strikes.
Even the newer "mallets" are heel and toe weighted, as per Karsten's engineered design. I have an Odyssey 7, and it has heel and toe weighting. Taylormade Spyders have similar weighting. As "they" say, it's not rocket science, but it is good engineering!Great point. I've been playing Anser type putters for decades. My gamer is a fifteen year old Odyssey. I also have a Scottie Cameron Newport type that is more than a decade old. It appears now most of the tour guys are playing mallets. I think Scheffler's putting really got better when he switched to a mallet. Putting is the strongest part of my game and I'm too old to switch.
I didn't watch the video, but why do so many putters emulate/copy the Ping Anser that Karsten Solheim (an engineer) designed nearly 70 years ago? Because the weight is at the heel and the toe and that minimizes twisting(torque) on off centre strikes.
Don’t think that it true. A small deflection is all that is needed to miss, or to hole it if you were going to miss!Got part way through before I got bored. My point still stands that no putter will twist in the stroke if you have a grip that is stronger than a dead beetle
Is it a game improver or a super game improver?Which is also why it's ridiculous to call an Anser style putter a blade, it's a cavity back.
Interesting vid, thanks for sharing. I've still never tried one of these putters, he seems to suggest they are just another option to try rather than something that's better than what came before.
The most telling thing was near the end, the thing that would put me off, and Shiels has said it too in some of his reviews actually - that the centre-shafted "zero torque" putters rotate and deflect more when you hit the toe or heel. That's not ideal. Particularly since the last time I tried a centre-shafted putter all I could do was hit it out of the toe.![]()
How is this deflection going to happen if you are holding the club with any sort of pressure at all? Would need a strong gust of wind or a small child grabbing the clubDon’t think that it true. A small deflection is all that is needed to miss, or to hole it if you were going to miss!
Do a little research…How is this deflection going to happen if you are holding the club with any sort of pressure at all? Would need a strong gust of wind or a small child grabbing the club![]()
I only used it for a month, didn't have time to get used to it really. If you think about it, someone who's only ever used heel-shafted putters, using a centre-shafted for the first time, you would expect to hit a few out of the toe - as that's where the middle of it used to be, in relation to the shaft.That sounds like more of a ball to your eyes alignment / your putting stroke style problem.
According to Dave Pelz centre shafted putters are best suited to players that have a straight back/ straight forward stroke.
I made the switch decades ago and would not buy anything else.
Times like this I enjoy the 'x1.2' speed function on YouTube.Jeez that was a boring video.
I watched about 10 mins and gave up.Times like this I enjoy the 'x1.2' speed function on YouTube.![]()
I agree. A blade putter would be the Wilson 8802, Wilson 8813, the Spalding Cash-In or the Acushnet Bullseye. Those models are not around much anymore. I think the younger generation incorrectly started calling the Anser type putters blades to distinguish them from the mallets. Cavity backs is probably more accurate. It took me awhile to switch from my 8813 to an Anser. Today I putt with an older 'Anser type" Odyssey. The Spider type putters look weird to me. Obviously, these newer mallets work because the best players in the world are using them.Which is also why it's ridiculous to call an Anser style putter a blade, it's a cavity back.
I agree that they are increasingly rare but I still have both an 8802 and a Bullseye dating from the 1980's.I agree. A blade putter would be the Wilson 8802, Wilson 8813, the Spalding Cash-In or the Acushnet Bullseye. Those models are not around much anymore. I think the younger generation incorrectly started calling the Anser type putters blades to distinguish them from the mallets. Cavity backs is probably more accurate. It took me awhile to switch from my 8813 to an Anser. Today I putt with an older 'Anser type" Odyssey. The Spider type putters look weird to me. Obviously, these newer mallets work because the best players in the world are using them.